Sunday, February 22, 2009

The Killer countess: Baron Heinrich Thyssen's daughter , Baron "Heini" Thyssen-Bornemisza.


The Killer countess: Baron Heinrich Thyssen's daughter , Baron "Heini" Thyssen-Bornemisza.

Baron Hans Heinrich "Heini" Thyssen-Bornemisza with his fifth and final wife, Carmen, the former Miss Spain

" ... in the last days of the Second World War, Margit hosted a party for SS officers, Gestapo leaders and local collaborators during which 200 Jews were slaughtered, as entertainment. ... "
••••••••••••••
The killer countess: The dark past of Baron Heinrich Thyssen's daughter.

She was born into one of Europe's most powerful dynasties. And involved in a wartime atrocity so shocking that it remains shrouded in secrecy to this day. We investigate the dark past of Baron Heinrich Thyssen's daughter Margit...


When I was researching my book about his family, Baron "Heini" Thyssen-Bornemisza, self-styled "Swiss" industrialist and legendary art collector, always insisted that Margit, his vivacious older sister, was in fact shy and retiring, while his family's castle at Rechnitz had been entirely destroyed by the Russians during the war.

I first suspected he may have been lying when Josi Groh, his Hungarian lawyer, told me that far from being shy and retiring Margit had a "voracious sexual appetite" and that she had remained in residence at the Thyssens' castle throughout the war, enjoying the attention of the SS officers sent there for rest and recreation. But it was his insistence that the castle, or what remained of it, hid a terrible secret that encouraged me to visit Rechnitz.

In this quiet castle town in the foothills of the Alps, I learnt that in the last days of the Second World War, Margit hosted a party for SS officers, Gestapo leaders and local collaborators during which 200 Jews were slaughtered, as entertainment. Ever since, the Thyssens have not accepted involvement and have played down their Nazi past. '

The story begins with Heini's German father, Heinrich, heir to one of the world's largest industrial fortunes. Having profited from the First World War, but lacking an "appropriate" social position, he acquired Hungarian nationality and the dubious title of baron. To complete his reinvention as a Hungarian aristocrat, Baron Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza de Kaszon bought himself a castle at Rechnitz, 150km south of Vienna, on the Austro-Hungarian border. But in 1938, when it became obvious that another war was looming, the "Baron" transferred ownership of the castle to his daughter and slipped across the border to the safety of Switzerland.

From Villa Favorita on the shores of Lake Lugano, Heinrich controlled his German mines and factories throughout the war; supplying the Third Reich with coal, steel and U-boats. He also provided his close friend Hermann Goering and the Nazi secret service with international banking facilities, while in 1941 his August Thyssen Bank in Berlin contributed 400,000 Reichmarks towards the upkeep of the castle, which had by then been requisitioned by the SS.

Meanwhile Margit remained at the castle, where she was provided with a generous allowance from Thyssengas, one of her father's German companies. A Thyssengas employee and Nazi Party member, Joachim Oldenburg, was seconded to assist in managing the estate. Locals employed at Rechnitz report that the "young, dashing and virile" Oldenburg quickly accepted responsibility for accompanying Margit on hunting trips – and was soon sharing her bed.

This despite the fact that, in 1933, Margit had enhanced her social position by marrying the impoverished Count Ivan Batthyany, whose family had originally owned the town of Rechnitz and a large slice of Hungary. In a bizarre arrangement, while "the countess" shared the castle with her SS guests and her bed with Joachim Oldenburg, her estranged husband continued to enjoy his wife's money and breed horses on one of the Batthyanys' adjoining Hungarian estates.

Further complicating her domestic arrangements, Margit was also enjoying a dalliance with the sexually ambitious Franz Podezin, a Gestapo administrator and leader of the Rechnitz Nazi Party.

But SS officers were not Margit's only guests at Rechnitz. At the end of 1944, 10,000 Hungarian Jews and gypsies had joined the 100,000 forced labourers building fortifications along the Austro-Hungarian border, which were designed to stop the advancing Red Army. During the 200km westward march from Budapest they were subjected to atrocities at the hands of their guards while local inhabitants felt free to shoot at them as they passed by – thousands died.

Six hundred Jews, assigned to strengthen the Rechnitz defences, were housed in the cellars of the castle, living in appalling conditions. Many were arbitrarily beaten and shot, particularly by Podezin, while local people reported the countess derived obvious sadistic pleasure from observing these barbaric acts: "She always stood right at the front when anything like that was going on," said one witness.

By the spring of 1945, it had become obvious that it was only a matter of time before the advancing Russians would overrun the area but Margit appeared determined to remain at the castle until the last possible minute.

Finally, with the Red Army only 15km away, the countess hosted a party at the castle on the 24 March, the eve of Palm Sunday, inviting up to 40 people including leading Nazi Party, SS, Gestapo and Hitler Youth members. The party started at 9pm and lasted until dawn, with a great deal of drinking and dancing. But traditional party entertainment was not enough, and at around midnight some 200 half-starved Jews, pronounced unfit for further work, were delivered by lorry to "Kreuzstadel", a barn within walking distance of the castle. Podezin then ushered Margit and 15 of the more senior guests to a store room, gave them weapons and ammunition and invited them to "kill some Jews".

The prisoners were then forced to strip naked before being shot by drunken guests, who returned to the castle to continue to drink and dance until dawn. The following morning, they were heard bragging about the previous night's atrocity: one Stefan Beiglboeck even claiming that he had "slain" six or seven Jews with his own hands.

The bodies of the victims were buried by 15 of the prisoners saved for the purpose. The burial party were kept in the local abattoir before being shot the following evening by Oldenburg and Podezin.

Many years later, Heini admitted his family's industrial and financial support of Hitler and the Third Reich, but he avoided providing any details concerning the Rechnitz massacre.

But within hours of arriving at Rechnitz, my research partner Caroline Schmitz and I had been quizzed by the local innkeeper as to why we were there. He introduced us to sons of the castle's wartime staff and to a retired teacher and the town's official historian, Doctor Josef Hotwagner – a charming man whose ill health does nothing to diminish his wit or his academic skills. Known locally as "the Professor", he is regarded with affection in the town, despite the occasional accusation of being a trouble maker. But Hotwagner has a better reason than most for remaining determined that the Rechnitz massacre should never be forgotten.

The people who committed the barbaric execution were the same people who, in 1941, effectively killed his father by charging him with high treason and sentencing him to 10 years' hard labour at Dachau. Hotwagner senior had been among a small group of townspeople discovered to be supporting the starving women and children left behind when their persecuted men-folk had been shot or forced into slave labour. Dachau was liberated by the Americans in 1945, but Hotwagner's father died in hospital before he was able to return to his family. Josef still displays obvious emotion when recalling the terrible story of both his father and his town.

He remembers the terrible dilemma at eight years of age of he and his mother being forced to leave his grandparents as the battle front drew closer, fleeing into the countryside to take shelter in a wine cellar.

But when the Russian attack finally took place during the night of 29 March 1945, the Red Army, facing very little opposition, soon overran the town and the surrounding vineyards. After being shot at by a drunken Russian soldier, Josef and his mother decided to return to the town, where more sober soldiers shook their hands in greeting. But the castle was already alight, and he remembered "the sky was blood red from the flames for three whole days". Although the Russians were blamed for setting it alight, Hotwagner and many of the townspeople believe it was the German forces who torched it, in compliance with Hitler's "Nero Command", or scorched earth policy.

After a brief counterattack by the SS and the loss of more than 1,000 lives, the Germans eventually admitted defeat, leaving the Russians to occupy Rechnitz and Eastern Austria for the next 10 years.

According to Hotwagner, the victorious Russians soon discovered that, 12 days earlier, a large number of Jews had been murdered, and following further investigation issued a protocol which read: "We, the undersigned have written down the following in order to bear witness of the Fascists' bestiality. On 5th April, a number of graves were excavated, where Jews were buried who had been killed in a bestial manner. In all, 21 graves were found, each one being 4m to 5m long and 1m wide. Each grave contains 10 to 12 people, victims of shots in the neck using firearms or machine ' pistols. The murdered people were very emaciated. An examination of their bodies revealed many bloodshot and blue areas on their skins. Apparently, they had been hit with sticks and rubber clubs prior to being shot. The inhabitants say that on 24 March these people had to dig their own graves and were shot immediately afterwards."

This protocol was published on 12 April 1945 in the Soviet national newspaper, The Red Star, but was subsequently dismissed as propaganda by many Austrians. During the resulting legal proceedings which took place in 1946 before the "people's court", the graves were again opened and an exact location plan was compiled and placed with the Austrian District Court in Oberwart. However, shortly afterwards this plan disappeared. It was only the first of a number of such conspiratorial occurrences.

In the years 1946 to 48, several further legal proceedings took place. But in 1946 the two main witnesses were murdered and one also had his house burnt down to destroy any incriminating evidence. Fear spread, and as a result, most of the witnesses revoked their testimonials during the main proceedings, or toned them down, or failed to appear at court. The few sentences that were awarded to those who hadn't already fled were very lenient and after a few years they were freed on appeal.

The court also uncovered evidence that suggested further murderous acts had been committed in Rechnitz. This was supported by one Paul Szomogyi, who said in his witness statement that on 26 March 1945, 400 Jews from his group of forced labourers had also been killed in a similar fashion. But due to intimidation, he failed to appear in front of the court, which claimed his testimonial could not be investigated any further.

Margit, along with Podezin and Oldenburg, also avoided prosecution, having fled Rechnitz ahead of the advancing Russians and escaped to Switzerland where, having facilitated the latter's return to Germany, Margit housed Podezin in a small apartment above a bar in Lugano, from where he continued to fulfil his role as her lover. But eventually, Podezin's presence became embarrassing and he was forced to leave. Under threat from the criminal proceedings, he demanded financial assistance from Oldenburg and Margit to enable him to escape to South Africa, threatening to "drag Oldenburg and the countess through the mud" if ignored. Funds were forthcoming and Podezin was last seen in Pretoria, while Oldenburg fled to Argentina.

It was not until 1987 that the Refugius (Rechnitz Refugee and Commemorative Initiative and Foundation) was founded and began to organise the erection of a monument to commemorate the massacre. The association also bought the land on which the Kreuzstadel stood, presenting it to the Vienna-based Israelitische Kultusgemeinde organisation. Every year a small commemorative service takes place at the site, although only one of the victims, Laszlo Blum, has ever been identified.

In the local park, a memorial to four murdered resistance fighters, including Dr Josef Hotwagner senior and the "200 Jewish forced labourers from Hungary, who were murdered on 24 March 1945", was finally unveiled – on the opposite side of the park to the monument honouring the names, and photographs, of the 177 local soldiers who lost their lives in the war, fighting for the Reich.

The atmosphere during the unveiling of the memorial to the Jews and members of the resistance was overshadowed by the knowledge that a meeting of the Rechnitz Comrade Club, whose leader was Tobias Portschy, ex-SS, Wehrmacht member and Nazi Gauleiter, was to take place on the local Geschriebenstein mountain the following day. This was not to commemorate the liberation of Austria from the Nazis, but the noble defence of the homeland by the Wehrmacht.

Tobias Portschy died of natural causes in 1996 but a disturbing number of local people still share his beliefs. As recently as 1985 the journalist who wrote a series of articles in the Austrian newspaper Oberwarter Zeitung on the murders under the headlines, "The Rechnitz Murder", "Orgy Ball" and "Dance Macabre" decided to curtail the series after his life was threatened. Meanwhile, a recording of an old woman's eye-witness report, sent to the Austrian television channel ORF by Josef Hotwagner, was permanently "mislaid".

According to local legend, the landlady of the local Gasthaus Rose and widow of Tobias Portschy believed that trying to locate the exact burial site, so that the remains of the victims could be reburied in a Jewish cemetery, was completely unnecessary. She is quoted as saying: "Don't look for the Jews' bones. Look for the gold that they buried."

She and her husband also openly expressed their hatred of gypsies, and a number of the townspeople appreciated the irony when, many years later, they accepted money for housing refugee gypsies in their hotel.

While reactions to the memory of the terrible atrocity remain mixed, there are few members of the community who forgive the Thyssens for failing to repair the castle which had, since the 13th century, been both their town's soul and the reason for its existence. Instead, the remaining building suffered the ignominy of being converted into apartments and the Thyssens' private chapel into a bar.

When the Russian occupation ended, Margit arrogantly returned to Rechnitz as a guest at the Batthyanys' newly built hunting lodge, shooting deer and wild boar in the surrounding forests. Otherwise, she occupied herself by breeding horses at the Thyssens' Erlenhof stud farm, near Bad Homburg in Germany. The original owner of Erlenhof, the Jewish paper manufacturer Moritz James Oppenheimer, was arrested by the Nazis in 1933 and forced to sign a declaration of bankruptcy prior to his death, which the authorities claimed to have been the result of his suicide. Heinrich then bought the stud from the liquidators for a fraction of its true value before leaving it to Heini. He then leased it to his sister who successfully rejected all post-war claims for restitution.

Without ever being implicated in the atrocity, Ivan and Margit died of old age in 1985 and 1989 respectively. But the Count Batthyany of Güssing, near Rechnitz, appeared to be unwilling to permit their burial in the family crypt at their Franciscan chapel, despite or because of the fact that Count Ivan's father, Count Ladislaus Batthyany, eye surgeon and benefactor, was in the process of being beatified; the third stage of the sainthood process that had started in 1944 and was finally carried out by Pope John Paul II in 2003.

What is remarkable about Margit's complicity in the Rechnitz massacre, is the fact that Germany, despite claims to the contrary, still suffers from a selective memory: only publishing carefully edited versions of the history of the Thyssens, which avoid reference to the family's anti-Semitism.

In 2003, an authorised history of the Thyssens, Fritz Thyssen – Hitler's Benefactor and Hostage was published in Germany, which quoted from a letter illustrating Fritz Thyssen's (Heinrich's brother) refusal to do business with Jewish industrialists, because of their criminal record rather than his anti-Semitic views, which are contained in the same letter. None of the previously published histories of the Thyssens, either social or industrial, in books or periodicals, have mentioned the Rechnitz story or the full extent of the family's involvement with the Third Reich.

The fact that ThyssenKrupp AG refused to grant me access to its archives during my research, and 23 prominent German publishers rejected The Thyssen Art Macabre prior to its UK publication, may not immediately signify a cover-up, but when, at the last minute the Bertelsmann-owned Spanish publisher demanded that I remove all references to the Nazis before they would publish, it was difficult not to suspect a degree of conspiracy. Having been published in the UK by Quartet, The Thyssen Art Macabre will now be published in Spain, home of the Thyssen-Bornemisza art collection, by Temas de Hoy, a Spanish-owned publisher who made no such demands. Meanwhile, German publishers still appear to ignore the book. *

CIA, THE NAZIS and the advent of the inextricable Siamese twins: CIA/MOSSAD as of the fabled mid-1990s...






CIA, THE NAZIS and the advent of the inextricable Siamese twins: CIA/MOSSAD as of the fabled mid-1990s...PNAC and 9/11.

... I don’t ask this question gratuitously or with any malicious intent. I even expect a few Jews may appreciate that I asked it. Indeed the ones I’ve asked before had no idea of the facts surrounding the question telling that me indeed it was a good question.

Here goes. First a little background. At the end of World War II, the United States entered into a the dark areas of foreign intelligence we’d always steered clear of before then. America was built as a haven for immigrants trying to escape the trappings of the royal games of Europe played since the dawn of time, actually from around the time Abraham and originates from.

Before WW II, we had the OSS, the Office of the Secret Service as our sole foreign intelligence agency. Before the war, the OSS didn’t do much. We were strong and independent with no dreams of expanding our empire beyond our own borders. We just wanted to be free and be left alone. After the war, we inherited responsibilities in Europe and around the world that expanded our vision beyond where we had the background to understand or talent to control.

Meanwhile we held in our hands the fate of thousands of Nazi intelligence officers who served under Hitler. They had been allowed to expand their intelligence network with little oversight or moral perimeters because Hitler was using them to aid him in taking over the world. Some wanted to put them on trial while other wanted to put them to work for us. In the end, we built a new agency around them that became our primary source of information in Europe, the CIA.

Conspiracy theory? No way. It’s a matter of public record, in fact a very popular one referred to as “Project Paperclip.” In fact a recently published cable TV History Channel documentary explores how ex-Nazi intelligence officers making a very good living working for us fabricated the cold war out of the Soviet Union’s rusting military to insure an ongoing need for them to secure us against a common threat. And of course our leaders had fallen in love with the threat of Russian tyranny to defend us against because of the massive military infrastructure they got to build using trillion dollar budgets to do it with.

This is the description given for the content of “Conspiracy?: CIA and the Nazis”

“Six months after Allied Forces liberated German concentration camps, a military tribunal formed at Nuremberg to prosecute Nazi war criminals. Some of the most dangerous were brought to justice--but not all.”

“CONSPIRACY? reveals how over 4,000 former Nazis went to work for the U.S. government, without the public's knowledge, to help fight the Soviet Union. Reinhard Gehlen, an intelligence officer for Hitler's General Staff, was tapped to head the U.S. intelligence program in West Germany to spy on the Russians. At the same time, former Nazi scientists and engineers were welcomed onto American soil. But the extent of these operations is only now becoming clear: In 1998, a law was passed mandating declassification of documents concerning recruitment of former Nazis. CIA AND THE NAZIS examines these files to see how far the U.S. went in recruiting its former enemy to fight its new one.”

The question is why haven’t Jews ever said anything about this?

The CIA is run by Nazi’s. Since we were stupid enough to let our most sensitive agency be run by the enemies of mankind, it shouldn’t be a surprise that the CIA causes us so much trouble all over the world. And after having made this mistake, its even understandable that we would keep it secret to avoid the disgrace we would face if the whole world knew that we are a free people actually being manipulated by an evil agency in our own government that we can’t reign in without everyone finding out how we allowed this to happen.

But why haven’t Jews raised concerns about this inescapable fact so all the world knows what is really going on behind the scenes of our intelligence industry? I mean that as a serious question that demands a serious answer. I don’t mean to imply there’s a reason behind why they haven’t taken action on this issue which points to a secret collaboration between Jews and Nazis. I just want to know the answer to fill in the gaps of the story the History Channel documentary left out. It boggles my mind whenever I think about it. It just seems impossible for this to have ever happened. Even of we had been stupid enough to consider letting Nazis run our clandestine foreign affairs, I would have thought the voice of the Jewish people would have nipped it in the bud before it ever got off the ground.

But even now, whenever I cross the Potomac River on the 395 Northbound bridge into Washington DC passing the Holocaust Museum as I enter the Mall between the Washington Monument and US Capitol near the White House, which is a just a few miles from the headquarters of the CIA, it confuses me for a few days because the Jewish community is still silent on this issue. Maybe they haven’t really picked up on the link. I have even brought it up to a few conspiracy theorists who themselves were startled that they hadn’t ever asked themselves the same question.

It’s just that, well,,, I think it might be important. I think maybe we need to look at it seriously. I’m not an expert in this kind of thing. It just seems that if the CIA was built to house Nazis, that might be why they cause so much trouble around the world. I mean just think about what the world might be like now if the CIA had not been built with Nazis as it central controlling authority. Then it might be the kind of world we would recognize as being more American than it is now representing the kind of values we as citizens think our country stands for. But our intelligence industry seems to have its own agenda that doesn’t seem to work well for us where the world looks at us as citizens with praise but hates our foreign policy.

I guess what I mean is rather than asking a potentially uncomfortable question about why Jews have been silent on this topic so far is to ask them to raise the Nazi running the CIA issue now since they have every right to. Then we can put pressure on our leaders to clear our intelligence industry of the kind of nefarious motives and bad habits towards other countries that have been causing us so many problems over the last 60 years. We built this nation to give free-minded people a place to come to get away from the same kind of evil we employ to run our most sensitive foreign affairs agency. So it’s no wonder the world has such a love/hate relationship with us.

My view is that everything would change if we challenged the approach our intelligence agencies use to manage our clandestine affairs as they learned it from Hitler’s henchmen. I ask myself what we would have taught the world if we hadn’t gone down the dark road we’re dead-ended on now. The answer is we obviously wouldn’t be where we are now, we would be living a totally different world. And the way we arrived where we are now still hasn’t been properly addressed so how are we going to go back the other way. It just seems that for us to escape from the prison camp we’re allowing to be built around us now, we need to acknowledge how we got here. The only people that have a right to table this issue and demand change is Jews. That’s why I ask the question, which is why haven’t they done it already?

I mean I’m asking the question of how we found ourselves letting Nazis run our intelligence industry but no one is going to listen to me. When Jews make a lot of noise, the world listens. This just seems like one of those issues that Jews would raise like they have over lesser seeming threats concerning ex-Nazis in the past. And their being vocal on those matters has always lead to debate and change. So I’m asking why is there silence on this particular aspect of the remnants of Hitler’s Germany when it might be the very reason why we have so much trouble getting along with the rest of the world.

Personally I think it’s impossibly insane that Jews have not alerted the world about this story. Sometimes I wonder if I’m in a prolonged nightmare because it’s the only way I can explain how this could have happened. Whatever the answer is, I wish Jews would bring attention to it now. A lot of us who don’t like the way the CIA set us up as the rest of the worlds enemy would likely get behind a push to force more transparency on what’s really driving all the problems that threaten our future.

It’s not complicated. Thousands of the most notorious Nazis in the world were employed to run the CIA. The CIA has followed policies that are counterproductive to our goals and alien to our way of life. This issue has never been properly vetted. It needs to be. Jews can make it happen. So why aren’t they? Because the Siamese twins CIA and MOSSAD have become ONE, precisely in the early nineties....as never before, since I witnessed quite a few acute differences between CIA and MOSSAD in the 70s and 80s...but all of a sudden and just in time for the Project for a new American Century...the BOND took form and CIA MOSSAD became intertwines, meshed, inextricably as ONE spy agency for the common good of the neo-PNAC hegemons, hell bent on fracturing the whole world into thousands of tribes with flags for their own selfish and greedy benefit.

"There's a lot of symbolism involved when the Siamese twins, CIA/MOSSAD choose their targets and the dates of their attacks."





"There's a lot of symbolism involved when the Siamese twins, CIA/MOSSAD choose their targets and the dates of their attacks."
In this topsy-turvy post-9/11 new world order, the label "anti-Semite"
is the price one pays for asserting that two plus two equals four...

George Orwell, that most relevant of modern writers, predicted things would be like this...
“Ariel Sharon and Rafi Eitan believed they could change the world by force with 9/11 and a global never ending massacres and wars,” . “Shimon Peres believed we could change it by being utter and constant liars, pretend to be nice, friendly and stupid. They are ALL three narcissistic megalomaniac psycopaths...”

Terror attacks are more likely to occur on anniversaries of earlier attacks. Everyone agrees about that. The Oklahoma City bombing of April 19 occurred exactly two years after the Branch Davidian conflagration in Waco. The Bali bombing of Oct. 12, 2002 occurred exactly two years after the attack on the USS Cole...which was a MOSSAD operation in Yemen.

The major and cataclysmic assassinations of the infamous White House Murder INC, follow the same logic... from the assassination of Ambassador DOBBS in Kabul, Afghanistan, to 01-23-2002 in Karachi, Pakistan, to 01-24-2002, in Hazmieh Beirut and 02-14-2005 in front of the St Georges Hotel....

http://univercia.blogspot.com/2008/04/us-ambassador-adolph-dubsrip.html

In the summer of 2007, the Bush administration claimed to have broken up a terror plot to blow up several airplanes simultaneously as they flew from the UK to the US -- on 9/11. They regularly tell us that another terror attack, probably much worse than 9/11, is not just a matter of if, but when. Lately they've been more vociferous than usual.

The fourth anniversary of the March 11, 2004 Madrid bombings is two days away, and the fifth anniversary of the March 19, 2003 Iraq invasion is next week. Does the Bush administration know more than we do about where and when another terror strike might occur, and who might be behind it?

Conspiracy Coding

"The date of the attack, the 11th, may be only a coincidence, but it won't be ignored as investigators try to figure out who was behind today's deadly commuter train attacks in India . The 11th has now been chosen as an attack date in New York , Madrid and Mumbai." -- Brian Ross, ABC News

With the words above, spoken on the same day as the Mumbai attacks, ABC's Brian Ross came as close as anybody in mainstream media ever came to revealing what no one in the power elite wants to talk about: the date code connecting the terror attacks that have justified the global war and the Homeland state.

As Ross noted, the number "11" figures prominently in the 9/11 attack on New York , the 3/11 attack on Madrid and the 7/11 attack on Mumbai. He easily could have gone further with his 11-based analysis. The attacks on London occurred on 7/7 -- read "77," a multiple of Mumbai's 7/11 -- "7 x 11." The attack on Amman , Jordan occurred on 11/9 -- which is 9/11 backwards.

The numbers add up to a coded conspiracy, whether you believe it's a conspiracy of "Al Qaeda" or of "Al CIA-duh." To a cryptanalyst (code-breaker), the only nonsensical explanation is that it's all just a coincidence. The odds against all five major international terror strikes since the year 2000 being rooted in the number 11, with four out of five of them containing the number 11, are astronomical.

Purposeful Perpetrators

"Good morning. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison." -- George W. Bush

Every one of the attacks worked against Muslim interest, and in favor of the global war partners trying to wrest control of the Mideast from them. A by-the-numbers review clarifies the point:

9/11 -- The Big Bang that started it all, 9/11 was "the new Pearl Harbor " that Bush geo-strategists were writing about and hoping for before the 2000 elections. Without 9/11, there could not have been a global war or a Homeland state.

3/11 -- "The European 9/11" occurred just days before the Spanish elections, and at first analysts thought that it would jolt Spain to the right. Since the Spanish left wanted to pull out of Iraq , 3/11 was an attempt to keep a major partner in the global war.

7/7 -- "The British 9/11" occurred on the eve of a contentious G-8 summit in Scotland , thereby distracting attention away from the inevitable protesters. It cemented UK commitment to the global war and helped it copycat the Homeland state.

11/9 -- "The Jordanian 9/11" killed key members of Palestinian intelligence attending a wedding, prompted King Abdullah to oust his cabinet and resulted in a pro-Western tilt. 11/9 was a de facto coup d'état of Jordan in favor of the global war, and it secured the Israeli flank for its upcoming war against Lebanon .

7/11 -- "The Indian 9/11" occurred the day before Israel's attack on Lebanon, and went far in assuring that world opinion turned against "Islamic terrorists," on whom the attacks were blamed, rather than in favor of the Islamic population of soon-to-be-blitzed Beirut. 7/11 was a heavily coded event, with 7 train bombs in 11 minutes, and the code was so apparent that American media had to "stay in front" of the story with Brian Ross's ABC News report.

Mainstream Misinformation

"You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month." - CIA operative’s comment, reported by Philip Graham , Washington Post

Mainstream media apologists would argue that ABC's broadcast of the date code story discredits skeptics like me who believe that there is little difference between ABC and the NSA, CNN and the CIA or FOX and the FBI. After all, they would suggest, how could anyone argue that ABC was trying to cover up the very story that ABC was reporting?

Let ABC prove the case against itself.

Slowly read the headline and link to the ABC News story:

" New York , 9/ll; Madrid , 3/11; Mumbai, 7/ll" http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/07/new_york_9ll_ma.html

Pat yourself on the back if you picked up the three errors that sabotaged the headline and link:

One: In the headline two of the three date codes do not contain 11's -- instead, the New York and Mumbai dates contain a double "L." Compare "9/ll" with "9/11" and "7/ll" with "7/11."

Two: "3/11" is written correctly in the headline, probably to make sure that those of us who always type "ll" instead of "11" would also fail to find the story.

Three: The link also contains "9/ll" instead of "9/11."

All this clever sleight of hand was used so that ABC and the mainstream media, if accused of failing to report on the terror coding, could insist:

"ABC covered and published the story, and judging by exceedingly small number of people reading it on the Internet, no one seems to care very much about it."

Every word of their distortion would be true. The inconvenient truth that they covered up the references used to find their story would go unsaid. The case is made. Not only is there a conspiracy code, but there is a quite clear code of silence proving that mainstream media is in on the conspiracy.

Beware the Odds of March!

"A terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event (might cause) our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty- producing event." -- General Tommy Franks

Having written all this about the terror date code, I should note that its value as a predictive tool is limited. There are many 11-based odd-numbered date code possibilities in the calendar, and my experience is that it is a useful tool only when taken in conjunction with other indicators. In the absence of other indicators it would be presumptive to issue a terror warning, let alone make a specific prediction.

Last week, my record in issuing warnings and predictions prompted The Lone Star Iconoclast, the influential Texas weekly, to publish an editorial demanding an official investigation of my repeated success in anticipating petrochemical explosions in Southeast Texas . I used my knowledge of the terror date code in every case.

Time To Investigate Houston Is Now

http://www.lewrockw ell.com/roberts/ roberts259. html

In my opinion, the odds are in favor of an uneventful March, although there are enough dangerous indicators to merit a false flag warning:

One: General Gene Renuart, the Northcom commander, appeared before Congress last week and gave assurances that Northcom is ready for a WMD terror attack on the United States . Is this a veiled way of saying that Northcom is ready to carry out such an attack? The general's mind may have been on March 11 and the Madrid bombing anniversary when he said of Al Qaeda: "We need only to look at Spain and see that they're certainly willing to try to do something that is significant..."

Two: The military exercise, Cyber Storm II, is scheduled for this week. It pits thousands of personnel worldwide in a "practice war" against the Internet. Anglo/English countries worldwide -- Orwell's Oceania -- will be involved, including Australia , Canada , New Zealand , the UK and the US . As many analysts have noted, the Internet is the single biggest obstacle to false flag terror, and a practice war against it could easily "go live" and become an outright war.

Three: On March 11, NASA will launch Space Shuttle Endeavour. Two of the petrochemical events I successfully anticipated occurred within days of space shuttle launches. In both cases I had factored the NASA launches into my analysis....

Mumbai

Thanksgiving Day’s Mumbai mayhem was an all-too-convenient distraction from the bad news out of Iraq, whose parliament imposed a harsh status of forces agreement on the same day as the India attacks. It was also a distraction from the bad news out of Afghanistan where the day after Thanksgiving U.S. puppet president Hamid Karzai issued a first-ever request for a U.S. withdrawal date. The pro-war mainstream media blared “Mumbai Massacre!” incessantly over the holiday weekend, neatly omitting the disheartening details of our quicksand wars in the Middle East.

The particulars of the Mumbai attacks are still very sketchy, and have changed consistently. While it is still too early to state with absolute conviction that the India attacks were a state-sponsored false flag affair, there is a strong circumstantial case in favor of that surmise. After all, the attacks occurred within 24 hours of an FBI alert to New York City, amplified in Los Angeles. They had the effect of painting “patsy” Pakistan into a corner, surrounded by now-hostile India in the east and NATO/U.S.-occupied Afghanistan in the west. Finally, they were the perfect set-up for Obama to introduce his hawkish national security team, whose focus will be Afghanistan.

Added to the slew of “coincidences” was a chilling report. According to a bi-partisan Congressional committee headed by Senator Chris Dodd, which released its findings while Obama’s war team was doing its press conference, the U.S. will likely be hit by a nuclear or biological attack during the Obama presidency. That attack, they warn us, will likely come from Pakistan.

Briefly put, since Thanksgiving the stage has been set for an Obama escalation of the Global War and the Homeland State. In light of all this, American citizens should be concerned that the election has changed nothing, and that Obama will be a “Black Bush.” Patriots must not let their guard down. Eternal vigilance remains the price of liberty...

http://www.iath.virginia.edu/utc/proslav/prfibrha15t.html

http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Archives+and+Manuscripts/Kennedy.John+F/jfk_pre-pres/subcoll_1_HoR/02.+Speeches/

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Europe is still in the cross-hair of the PNAC hegemons...




« The deficiences of Global Capitalism », Georges Soros / CIA

Europe is still in the cross-hair of the PNAC hegemons...

Dans son livre écrit en 2002 « The deficiences of
Global Capitalism », Georges Soros / CIA écrit :

« La démocratie et la société ouverte ne peuvent être imposées
que de l’extérieur, parce que le principe de souveraineté fait
obstacle à l’ingérence extérieure. [...]
Certes, il est difficile de s’ingérer dans les affaires
intérieures de pays souverains, mais il est important de reconnaître le
problème ».

Pour Soros/CIA, une manière de s’ingérer dans un Etat souverain
consiste à attaquer sa monnaie pour produire un ensemble
d’effets dominos qui impacteront la sphère sociale et
produiront des révoltes sociales permettant au chef d’orchestre de la
crise d’imposer SA solution....

George Soros/CIA, l’un des valets du cartel bancaire (1), est
incontestablement l’un des instruments de cette politique de
démantèlement de la souveraineté des Etats.

La technique du financier consiste à doter ses organisations
philanthropiques de liquidités financières généreuses auprès de la
population et susceptibles de déchaîner des mouvements sociaux pour
entraîner la chute d’un gouvernement trop enclin à maintenir une
« société fermée » aux principes de la mondialisation sans frein.

Toute nation qui rejette la mondialisation (c’est-à-dire
l’impérialisme du libre-échange) est condamnée et fera l’objet
d’attaques de la part des organisations de Soros.

Dans la situation de crise actuelle, tout Etat-nation qui
refusera les solutions de l’élite impériale, c’est-à-dire de
l’establishment, subira sa loi.

Traduction : la crise prendra de l’ampleur !

Qui se souvient de ce qu’exprimait l’honorable Tony Blair, en
septembre 2005, dans un discours devant le Sommet mondial de l’ONU :

« A l’occasion de ce sommet, pour la première fois, nous nous
mettons d’accord sur le principe que les Etats n’ont pas le droit de
faire ce qu’ils veulent au sein de leurs propres frontières,
mais que nous, au nom de l’humanité, avons le devoir commun de
protéger les peuples là où leur gouvernement refuse de le
faire ».

N’est-ce pas clair ?


Comme la France est déjà dans le collimateur de ce groupe de
pervers, il serait regrettable de négliger les expériences menées
par les banquiers internationaux au sein de pays plus faibles,
comme aujourd’hui l’Ukraine.


L’Ukraine dans le collimateur du cartel bancaire

Mi-décembre 2008, H. Kissinger, le mentor de McCain durant la dernière
campagne présidentielle américaine, s’est rendu en Russie pour y
rencontrer les éminences grises du pouvoir russe...

Qui donc Kissinger représentait-il en Russie, puisque son « poulain »
a échoué ?

En réalité, rien n’a filtré sur ce voyage discret.

En novembre 2008, le Premier ministre ukrainien Julia Timochenko,
ex-alliée de Iouchtchenko dans la « Révolution orange » [financée
par G. Soros/CIA], a secrètement rencontré George Soros à Kiev.

Quelques jours après, G. Soros/CIA lançait une attaque massive
contre la monnaie nationale ukrainienne, la hryvnia.

Cette information n’est pas confidentielle puisque Viktor Baloga, le
chef de l’administration présidentielle ukrainienne, vient de
s’exprimer comme suit :

« Le Premier ministre fait comme si ni son gouvernement ni elle-même
n’avaient pas quelque chose à voir avec l’effondrement de la
monnaie nationale. Pourtant, la première vague de la baisse du cours
de la hryvnia a justement eu lieu après les négociations secrètes
de Mme Timochenko avec George Soros, le spéculateur financier
connu ».


Finalement, quand les principaux secteurs exportateurs de l’Ukraine
(acier et produits chimiques) s’effondrèrent, le gouvernement
s’est tourné vers le FMI afin d’obtenir un prêt de 16,5
milliards de dollars pour éviter une cessation de paiements.

Selon le magazine britannique The Economist, cette somme devrait
servir avant tout à rembourser les dettes des banques
ukrainiennes vis-à-vis des créanciers internationaux.

D’après des sources ukrainiennes, en contrepartie de ce prêt, le
gouvernement accepta d’engager le groupe Blackstone comme
consultant, groupe qui appartient à George Soros/CIA…

Dans le même temps, Poutine annonce que l’ère du gaz bon marché
est révolue. La Russie n’acceptera jamais une chute durable
des cours du pétrole et encore moins du gaz.

Derrière le conflit du gaz, quelque chose de bien plus grave est en
gestation.

Il peut sembler paradoxal que G. Soros, l’un des hommes de main
du « cartel bancaire » et de la CIA, s’en prenne directement à l’Ukraine
après avoir favorisé la « révolution orange ».

Pourquoi donc, aujourd’hui, les banquiers internationaux
cherchent-ils à faire tomber les pays du bloc de l’Est, ex-membres
de l’ex-URSS ?

N’y aurait-il pas une volonté secrète de désintégrer l’EUROPE elle-même ?

Au cours des trois prochaines années, assisterons-nous à une
IMPLOSION de l’Europe, posee par la CIA ?

Rappelons que l’Europe de l’Ouest sera la principale victime de
l’effondrement du crédit des pays de l’Est !

En outre, un piège d’une perfidie inouïe est actuellement tendu
aux Européens de l’Ouest. On charge la mule de dettes en
leur expliquant qu’il n’existe pas d’autres solutions et que
cela ne nous coûtera rien, mais l’on se garde bien de nous
avertir que c’est l’inflation qui détruira les économies à cause des
« soins palliatifs » usités avec excès....
_______________________________________________________
(1) George Soros/CIA n’a jamais agi seul dans ses opérations,
sachant que son intérêt premier a toujours consisté à tirer son
épingle du jeu face à ses sponsors.

Une décennie avant de lancer l’Open Society Fund, Soros quitte
son poste chez Arnhold and S. Blechroeder Inc., lequel lui offre
les fonds de départ pour créer le Quantum Fund NV, un fonds
off-shore qui gère, en 2001, entre 11 et 14 milliards de dollars.

Pour information, Arnhold and S. Blechroeder Inc. représentait les
intérêts des Rothschild à l’époque du chancelier allemand Bismarck.

Le Quantum Fund et le Soros Fund Management servent de sources de
financement pour les projets internationaux. Soros a choisi de créer son
fonds dans les Antilles néerlandaises, un protectorat de la monarchie
des Pays-Bas, et d’exclure tout Américain du
Conseild’administration et d’investissements du fond, afin d’échapper
aux regards des autorités américaines, ainsi qu’aux régulations et
aux impôts américains.
Tout en demandant de la transparence chez les autres, bien
évidemment.

Soros s’est tellement efforcé de contourner les lois américaines
qu’il ne siège même pas au Conseil de son propre fonds, mais
sert officiellement de « conseiller aux investissements » par le
biais du Soros CIA Fund Management, sis à New York.

Par contre, les investisseurs et le Conseil du Quantum Fund
abondent en financiers britanniques, italiens et suisses, la Reine
Elisabeth II détenant une position spéciale sur la liste des clients.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Israel, un Etat en perpetuelle tourmente




Israel, un Etat en perpetuelle tourmente de la droitisation Juxtaboutiste, dans le mauvais sense de l'Histoire et la negation de l'impossibilite de garder la totalite de la Palestine de 1947...dans la mesure ou le plus grand probleme de l'etat "Juif" est la demographie galoppante de la population Arabe, malgre les tentatives sauvages de l'etat d'Israel de les disperser par la force et l'agression journaliere sous differentes formes.

Netanyahu ne resoudra rien, car il est l'otage de la politique de PNAC, qui persiste et signe dans la folie de la fragmentation de la region et du monde Asiatique en milliers de Tribus avec des drappeaux..., le projet hegemonique continuera sans faille, mais avec des "repis" tactiques...


1'hypothese d'un morcellement regional visant a

proteger Israel est donc une explication confirmee de la

guerre en Irak, dans la mesure OU celles avancees par

1'administration Bush sont a tous points de vue insatisfaisantes.

D' autre part, les interventions decidees

a Washington menent a l'affaiblissement des regimes

politiques et plus largement des Etats qui se disloquent

a la suite des con flits fratricides entre groupes

ethniques dont les id~ntites se reveillent en periode de

crise sociale, economique et politi que. II reste un element

important afin de completer Ie puzzle. Qu'en estil

donc de la situation de l'Etat hebreu, partenaire

et allie privilegie des Etats-Unis? Pourquoi aurait-il

besoin d'un tel morcellement? Les aides venues de

Washington en matiere d'armement ainsi que la superiorite

economique du pays ne suffisent-elles pas a

assurer la securite de 1'Etat ? l'affaiblissement des pays

voisins est en effet couteux et cree des destabilisations

qui pourraient engendrer de nouvelles violences a

l' encontre d'Israel (attaques terroristes isolees ou mise

en cause politi que par des regimes faibles en quete

de legitimite). Mais, au vu des fortes particularites de

la nation israelienne (valeurs fondatrices, liens entre

1'Etat et la religion, evolution au sein de la societe) et

des donnees internationales actuelles, on con<;oit que

Ie jeu en vaille peut-etre la chandelle.

Baruch Kimmerling analyse ainsi la societe israelienne:

«La collectivite n' a jamais reussi a decider

si Ie judai"sme est une religion ou une sorte de nationalisme,

ou les deux. Immigrants colons, nous avons

besoin d'une legitimation pour etre ici. La religion

juive en presentait une. C' est pourquoi Ie sionisme

lai"que lui a emprunte ses themes cent raux et meme

sa terminologie. Desormais, l'hegemonie sioniste est

menacee par la decomposition du couple religionnation

1.» Pour eviter de choisir entre legitimite

religieuse et citoyennete lai"que, la declaration d'independance

de 1948 prevoit que «1'Etat d'Israel sera

fonde sur la justice, la liberte et la paix selon l'ideal

des prophetes d'Israel; il assurera la plus complete

egalite sociale et politique a tous ses habitants, sans

distinction de religion, de race ou de sexe ». Ce faisant,

elle mele donc references religieuses et garantie

d' egalite de traitement la"ique.

L'experience a montre que l'equilibre n'a pu se realiser,

comme l'illustre la situation des Arabes israeliens.

Palestiniens essentiellement musulmans et chretiens,

qui n'ont pas ete chasses ni ne sont volontairement partis

en 1948, ils sont devenus citoyens israeliens en 1949,

lorsque Israel a annexe les zones attribuees par Ie plan

de partage a l'Etat arabe.Jusqu'en 1966, ils ont donc ete

soumis a un gouvernement militaire qui les astreignait a

des permis de deplacement, au couvre-feu, et qui favorisait

la colonisation juive a travers la confiscation des

terres arabes. Depuis, comme Ie souligne A. Dieckhoff,

leur situation s' est amelioree. Ils jouissent de droits individuels

et collectifs leur garantissant la liberte de culte,

de conscience, de langue et de culture. Pour autant,

ils n'ont pas les memes droits civiques et sociaux que

les citoyens juifs. Ainsi par exemple, les zones defavorisees

auxquelles l'Etat verse des subventions visant

a encourager Ie developpement economique et social

n'incluent aucun village arabe, alors que les habitants

de ces villages sont nettement plus pauvres que Ie reste

de la population israelienne (50 % d' entre eux vivent

en dessous du seuil de pauvrete contre 5 % de la population

juive, et en moyenne Ie salaire d'un ouvrier arabe

est inferieur de 23 % a celui d'un ouvrier juif). Plus

encore, certaines discriminations peuvent prendre un

caractere legal. Depuis 1948, les Arabes d'Israel sont

exclus de Tsahal, l'armee israelienne, un des symboles

de l' appartenance a la communaute nationale (a l'exception

des druzes, en charge de la surveillance des zones

arabes). Le mariage entre juifs et non-juifs est prohibe.

La loi d'egalite devant l'emploi de 1988, qui prevoit

des poursuites en cas d' attitude discriminatoire, ne

s'applique qu'aux inegalites de traitement fondees sur

Ie sexe, les preferences sexuelles et Ie statut familial.

C'est dire combien l'idee meme de citoyennete des

Arabes d'Israel demeure incertaine, ce qui tient a la

nature de 1'Etat d'Israel. Alors qu'il a la particularite

forte d'etre la seule democratie du Proche-Orient,

il contrevient au principe meme d' egalite en mettant

l' accent avant tout sur l' ethnie et la judeite. Cree sur la

base de references bibliques et soumis a la pression permanente

des citoyens les plus religieux, qui malgre leur

faible nombre pesent fortement sur la vie politique,

l'Etat hebreu n' a pas a ce jour trouve les ressources lui

permettant de ne plus etre lie a la religion.

nest pourtant des periodes OU la cohesion nationale

s'opere, en depit des problemes lies au role central de

la religion. Elle semble alars reposer sur la necessite de

s'unir face aux menaces exterieures. Les guerres successives

avec les voisins arabes ont logiquement amene les

Israeliens a se preoccuper d' abord de survivre ensemble

face a l'ennemi avant de savoir exactement ce que

recouvrait ce « ensemble ». Mais la societe evoluant, la

question se pose sans cesse de maniere plus aigue et

prioritaire. Cherchant dans l'immigration la population

qui lui fait defaut face aux pays environnants, Israel a

accueilli notamment entre 1989 et 1994 plus de 500000

personnes venues d'ex-URSS, soit une augmentation

de 10 % de sa population en seulement cinq ansi. Or

ces juifs d' origine russe, qui representent aujourd'hui

20 % de la population israelienne, ne sont pas reconnus

par Ie Grand Rabbinat et connaissent d'immenses difficultes

a s'integrer dans la societe, se trouvant Ie plus

souvent dans des emplois dont la qualification ne correspond

pas a leur niveau de competence. A quoi s' ajoute

l'importance des travailleurs asiatiques immigres, qui

constituent presque un dixieme de la population.

Au total, pres de la moitie de la population d'Israel

n' est pas juive ou n' est pas consideree comme telle.Par

consequent, Ie caractere hebreu de l'Etat est menace.

Ceci constitue un risque non seulement pour sa cohesion

mais aussi et surtout pour sa taille (les colons sont

les individus les plus religieux), voire pour sa survie,

dans la mesure OU Ie caractere hebreu de l'Etat est son

trait premier.

Le sionisme - de « Sion », colline de Jerusalem puise

ses sources dans les textes sacres et dans l'histoire.

II est l'ideologie du retour des juifs en Palestine, appelee

en hebreu «Terre d'Israel» (Eretz-Israel). Pour

les theoriciens du peuple juif, son histoire commence

mille ans avant Jesus-Christ avec l'exil vers Babylone

et n'a cesse d'etre marquee par des tentatives de retour

d'une partie de cette population. S'appuyant notamment

sur la promesse biblique selon laquelle Dieu dit

a Abraham: « A ta posterite je donne ce pays, ce pays

OU coulent Ie lait et Ie miel », les sionistes designent la

Palestine comme seullieu possible d'implantation de

l'Etat hebreu.

Cet objectif est inscrit lors du Congres sioniste de

Bale du 29 au 31 aout 1897. Ainsi, au lien sentimental

ancien d'une partie des juifs pour cette region forte

de symboles se substitue une veritable revendication,

au nom de laquelle, des 1895, Theodor Herzl preconise

des methodes radicales : «Le double processus

d' expropriation et de deplacement des pauvres doit

etre mene de fac;on prudente et discrete. Que les proprietaires

fonciers s'imaginent qu'ils nous roulent et

nous vendent leurs biens a des prix exageres, nollS,

pour notre part, ne leur revendrons rien. »

En n~alite, comme toute revendication fondee sur

des arguments religieux, Ie sionisme est objet de debats1•

II ne s' agit pas ici de prendre part aces querelles, mais

simplement de faire valoir qu'une partie des arguments

a I'origine du sionisme sont aujourd'hui encore discutes

dans la mesure OU ils sont relies a des croyances.

Toutefois, il est interessant de noter que Theodor

Herzl, pere du sionisme politique moderne2, envisagea

la possibilite de creer I'Etat juif en Argentine. Dans ce

cas, I'element religieux s'effa~ait devant des considerations

pragmatiques, puis que ce pays presentait notamment

l' avantage de compter en son sein une population

juive consequente. Dans son ouvrage, con~u comme

un veritable plan d'action (L'Etat des Jui/s, sous-titre

Contribution a une solution moderne de la question

juive), Herzl ecrit: «Faut-il donner la preference a

la Palestine ou a l'Argentine? La Society prendra ce

qu'on lui donne et ce que I'opinion des Juifs choisira.

La Society procedera aux constatations. L'Argentine est

I'un des pays les plus riches du monde, d'une superficie

enorme, avec une faible population et un climat

modere. La Republique argentine aurait Ie plus grand

interet a no us ceder un morceau de son territoire.

L'infiltration juive actuelle y a naturellement provoque

quelque mecontentement; il conviendra d' eclairer

l'Argentine sur la nature differente de cette nouvelle

immigration juive1. »Mais l'auteur n' en oublie pas pour

autant I'importance de la religion et precise quelques

lignes plus loin: « La Palestine reste notre patrie historique

inoubliable. Son seul nom constituerait pour

notre peuple un cri de ralliement d'une extraordinaire

puissance2. »Entre affirmation du bien-fonde des arguments

bibliques et conscience de leur force mobilisatrice,

Herzllivre les raisons de sa preference mais ne

developpe pas davantage. II n'est pas evident, dans

ce cadre, de cerner la place exacte de la Bible dans Ie

projet etatique de I'auteur. Neanmoins, Ie choix s'etant

tres vite porte sur la Palestine, la question a perdu de

facto de son interet: la « patrie historique inoubliable »

I'emportera sur la proposition argentine.

Des lors, resultat d'une croyance et fruit d'une interpretation,

Ie mouvement sioniste a lui seul ne suffit

nullement a permettre la creation d'un Etat dans une

region majoritairement etrangere et hostile au projet.

Ce sont les circonstances qui, paradoxalement, ont agi

en sa faveur.

Le succes soudain du sionisme s'explique par l' antisemitisme

ambiant a la fin du XIXC siecle. II est significatif

que la these de Theodor Herzl ait vu Ie jour en pleine

affaire Dreyfus (1894-1906) et au moment des pogroms

(L'Etat des Jui/s parut en 1896). Herzl, d'ailleurs,

dit explicitement que son idee se fan de en reaction

contre l'antisemitisme : «Le projet que je presente ici

com porte 1'utilisation d'une force motrice bien presente

dans la realite. (. .. ) Tout depend de la force motrice.

Quelle est -elle? La detresse des Juifs. (. .. ) Ce que je

dis, c' est que si cette force est correctement utilisee, dIe

sera assez puissante pour actionner une machine importante

et mettre en marche des hommes et des chosesl. »

Herzl considere que la souffrance des juifs, victimes de

l' antisemitisme, peut donner lieu a une mobilisation

constructive et permettre la realisation de son plan. En

d'autres termes, 1'Etat juif est ici pense par rapport au

contexte, en reaction a 1'hostilite et la violence dont

sont victimes a cette periode de plus en plus de juifs.

Mais ses idees ne rencontrent alors que peu d' echos,

car, a la meme epoque, d' autres theories sont eIaborees

et connaissent un certain succes. Ainsi, les marxistes

considerent que la « question juive », produit

du capitalisme, trouvera sa solution avec l' avenement

du socialisme. Le judalsme liberal, present en France,

en Allemagne et en Angleterre, prone, quant a lui,

l' assimilation des juifs dans les Etats-nations dont ils

partagent la culture.

En somme, plus encore que les arguments theologiques,

ce sont les evenements antisemites qui fournissent

au mouvement sioniste sa plus grande raison

d'etre. L'idee de permettre aux juifs de ne plus etre

persecutes grace a la creation d'un Etat souverain fait

son chemin en Occident.

Pour des raisons melant strategie et culpabilite

culminante, au lendemain de la Deuxieme Guerre

mondiale, les gouvernements occidentaux participent

activement a la creation d'lsraeI.

La Grande-Bretagne, dans un premier temps,

etablit un «Foyer national» juif, sur la base de la

Declaration Balfour, en terre de Palestine alors sous

sa domination, Franr;ais et Britanniques s'etant partage

1'Empire ottoman par les accords Sykes-Picot de

1916. Diviser cette zone permettait pour la GrandeBretagne

- la formule n' est plus un secret pour personne

- de mieux y asseoir son regne. Or, s'y jouaient

deja Ie contrale de 1'acces a I'ocean lndien, la protection

de Suez et Ie contrale des ressources petrolieres

(dont 1'importance ne fut toutefois reellement perr;ue

qu'apres la Deuxieme Guerre mondiale).

Cette decision fut prise alors que la region entamait

une periode de secularisation, marquee par Ie declin

presque total de 1'influence de l'Eglise, et culminant

avec I'abolition du Califat ottoman par Atatiirk en 1924.

L'installation d'une nation sur la base d'arguments religieux

se revelait contraire a I'evolution des societes

locales. Toutefois, a ce stade, il ne s'agissait pas encore

d'une entite juridique souveraine mais d'un « Foyer »,

ce qui, selon la Commission King-Crane nommee par

Ie President des Etats-Unis Woodrow Wilson en 1919,

ne pouvait nullement mener a la construction etatique.

En effet, un tel projet aurait contredit, d'une part, Ie

principe wilsonien du droit des peuples a I'auto determination

(en 1'espece, les peuples arabes) et, d'autre

part, les conditions relatives au mandat britannique

sur la region donne par la Societe des Nations, qui prevoyait

l' organisation par la puissance mandataire de

l' accession des populations locales a 1'independancel.

Les juifs, pour leur part, ne concevaient pas ce

« Foyer national» autrement que comme une etape.

Le plan elabore par Theodor Herzl etait tres clair:

«Personne n'est assez fort ou assez riche pour transplanter

un peuple d'un en droit a un autre. Seule une

idee peut y parvenir. L'idee de I'Etat a cette force.

Tout au long de leur longue et tragique histoire, les

Juifs n'ont cesse d'entretenir ce reve royal: "1'an

prochain a Jerusalem" 1. » Rappelant l'anciennete de

cette aspiration pour les juifs, Ie pere du sionisme

moderne affirmait que ce retour ne pourrait se realiser

que dans Ie cadre de la structure etatique, unique

construction souveraine pour un peuple destine a se

retrouver.

En 1939, la Grande-Bretagne avait publie un ultime

Livre blanc excluant la creation d'un Etat juif, prevoyant

l'independance de la Palestine en 1949 via un partage

du pouvoir entre Juifs et Arabes et limitant l'immigration

juive et la vente de terres2• L'etape decisive intervint

au lendemain de la Deuxieme Guerre mondiale.

1. Herzl, op. cit., p. 29.

2. Ce Livre Blanc enoncait notamment : «On pouvait comprendre,

d'apres un passage de la Declaration Churchill de 1922,

que la Palestine n'etait pas destinee a devenir un Etat juif. Cette

declaration n'ayant pas fait disparaitre les doutes, Ie gouvernement

de Sa Majeste declare maintenant, sans equivoque, que

sa politique ne vise pas a faire de la Palestine un Etat juif. (... ) un

Etat ou les deux peuples, arabe et juif, se partageront l'autorite

gouvernementale de telle facon que les interets de chacun soient

sauvegardes. (. .. ) L'immigration juive sera maintenue, au caurs

des cinq prochaines annees, a un taux qui portera la population

juive au tiers environ de la population totale du pays. (. .. ) Apres

cette periode de cinq ans, aucune immigration juive ne sera autorisee,

a moins que les Arabes de Palestine n'y consentent. »

La guerre suspendit de facto ces engagements et la

culpabilite des Europeens joua en faveur des sionistes,

comme en temoigne Ie plan de partage. En substance,

55 % de l'ensemble du territoire palestinien devint

la propriete des juifs, qui ne constituaient pourtant

qu'environ un tiers de la population et ne possedaient

jusqu'alors que 7 % des terres. Ils obtinrent

les meilleures zones, c'est-a-dire celles OU se trouvait

la production d' agrumes et de cereales, la region en

amont du Jourdain OU se situait la principale source

d'approvisionnement en eau douce pour les Palestiniens

et les zones d'acces maritime, notamment. Ce

qui n'empecha pas Ben Gourion (Premier ministre

israelien de 1948 a 1954, puis de 1955 a 1963) de

declarer: « Le partage des Nations unies est injuste

car il prive les communautes juives de la moitie de

leur territoire biblique, »

Des lors, de coreligionnaires, les juifs deviennent

« les Juifs », membres d'un meme Etat-nation sou de

sans doute plus par la souffrance due a la haine dont

ils sont l' objet que par des elements objectifs, chacun

venant de cultures et d'horizons tres divers.

L'Etat alors naissant presente un caractere ambigu.

Le debat sur la traduction de l' ouvrage de Theodor

Herzl en est la parfaite illustration: Etat jui/ ou Etat

des fUlfs? Alors que les premieres publications ont

opte pour la premiere traduction, les plus recentes

ont choisi la seconde1, Selon l' expression choisie, il

s'agit de mettre davantage l'accent sur Ie caractere

juif de l'Etat lui-meme, Ie rendant excluant, ou sur sa

1. Notamment celie de Claude Klein, a laquelle nous nous rcfcrons

ICI.

vocation a accueillir notamment des juifs. Par comparaison,

un Etat islamique, regi par la charia (les regles

issues du Coran et des Hadith, recits de la vie du Prophete),

n'applique pas les memes lois qu'un Etat ou se

trouvent des musulmans, quand bien meme ceux-ci

seraient majoritaires.

Mais au-dela des querelles semantiques, l'ambigu"ite

apparait des lors qu'il est question de determiner les

fonctions d'Israel, les missions que sa population est

en droit d'attendre de lui. Tout en fondant son idee

de creation d'un Etat sur Ie rappel de la permanence,

dans I' esprit de nombreux juifs, de la celebre reference

religieuse : « l' an prochain a Jerusalem », et en proposant

l'installation de cette entite en Palestine, Theodor

Herzl a voulu un Etat la"ique.

Ainsi, la justification de la creation de l'Etat sur cette

terre deja habitee se fonderait sur la Bible, mais son

fonctionnement devrait ensuite en faire abstraction.

L'hiatus - en temoigne la permanence des debats sur

Ie sujet - est difficile a surmonter. Comment mettre de

cote Ie caractere religieux de I'Etat sans du meme coup

remettre en cause sa legitimite meme a exister? Une

reponse possible consiste a considerer la judeite non

comme une appartenance religieuse mais comme une

nationalite (les juifs deviennent « les J uifs »). Mais, disperses

dans de si nombreux Etats depuis si longtemps,

quel est Ie point commun de ces individus, si ce n' est la

religion? Sur quel element objectif se fonde Ie peuple

juif pour survivre a la diversite lin~uistique, culturelle

et historique de ses membres? L'Etat hebreu etant la

terre d' accueil des juifs, Ie legislateur a dil trancher

et donner une definition. La loi du retour de 1950 et

celle de 1952 prevoient ainsi que tout juif peut s' etablir

en Israel et acquerir ipso facto la nationalite. Dans

ce cadre, est juif « celui qui est ne d'une mere juive,

ou qui s'est converti au juda"isme, et qui n'appartient

pas a une autre religion ». Pour des raisons de pragmatisme

- voire de survie - face a une demographie arabe

largement superieure et en constante progression, il a

toutefois ete decide d' etendre I'attribution de la nationalite

israelienne aux familles des personnes juives

(enfants, petits-enfants et conjoints). Pourtant, la religion

demeure au creur de la nation, les amen dements

n' ayant pour but que de rendre I'Etat viable.

L'identite des Israeliens est donc un sujet eminemment

complexe. Tous ne sont pas croyants (ni meme

juifs), alors que la religion demeure au centre de

I'Etat. Dans ce cadre, I'evolution de la societe israeIienne

pose un probleme serieux pour la cohesion et

par consequent pour la survie d'Israel. L'hypothese

du morcellement, avancee au chapitre precedent,

aboutirait au renforcement des appartenances religieuses

dans la region, meme artificiellement, dans Ie

but - poIitique - de faire taire les menaces qui planent

sur Israel....

------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Article 22 du Pacte de la SDN .

1. Ibid., pp. 16-17.

1. Theodor Herzl, VEtat des Jui/s, trad. de Claude Klein, La

Decouverte, 2003, pp. 43-44.

2. Ibid., p. 44.•.

1. Certains theologiens ont notamment mis en valeur Ie fait que

la prom esse faite a Israel etait conditionnee a l' obeissance de ce

dernier aux commandements divins, condition non realisee.

2. QuaJifie de «politique », Ie sionisme se distingue du sionisme

« messianique » bien plus ancien en ce qu'il invite les juifs a

prendre en main Ie projet de retour en Palestine au lieu d' attendre

Ie retour du Messie pour ce faire.

3. La« Society of Jews» est un organe politi que, imagine par

Herzl, rassemblant les Juifs acquis a sa cause qui seront charges

de discuter avec les gouvernements pour les convaincre de faire

aboutir I'Etat des J uifs .

1. Sophie Goyer et Sarah Dettamante, « Minorites et identite

en Israel, facteurs de destabilisation interne », in Defense nationale,

novembre 1998, 54e annee, n° 11.

1. «La division s'aggrave entre Sefarades et Ashkenazes »,

Ha'aretz, cite in Courrier international, n° 342, du 22 au 28 mai 1997.