Israel is a perpetual Geostrategic project MANUFACTURED to separate the eastern flank of the Arab World from the Suez Canal, Egypt and Beyond...

THE MODERN STATE OF “ISRAEL” IS A FRAUD PERPETUATED UPON THE HUMAN RACE BY THE THUGS AT BRITISH CROWN INC...

It is BEYOND obvious that the whole scheming since 1894 & the Balfour Declaration of theft in the Levant, was a deliberate geostrategic barrier created from scratch by the Empire of utter criminals in London, in order to separate the eastern flank of the Arab World from the Suez Canal, Egypt and Beyond. This nuclearized geostrategic barrier allows the control of the main maritime choke points in MENA & Arabia, which can suffocate Asia etc. anytime the Zioconned West chooses to do so within a few months...This policy of support for a failed concept in the face of international law and simple Justice, still prevails in the corridors of the UKUSA alliance of Evils... Pathetic!

http://youtu.be/AOv_Ll_Pl08

Semite–A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians...

Arthur Koestler, author of The Thirteenth Tribe, easily the most expansive single work on the subject, states, “The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.” 1
This is the story of a kingdom of belligerent, warlike Caucasian nomads, having no linked ancestry with anything Israelite this side of Noah, yet adopting Talmudic Judaism and becoming the dominant — and virtually only — current force in twenty-first century international Jewry.

Where Do Jews Come From?

 

By EVAN R. GOLDSTEIN

This much is known: In the mid-eighth century, the ruling elite of the Khazars, a Turkic tribe in Eurasia, converted to Judaism. Their impetus was political, not spiritual. By embracing Judaism, the Khazars were able to maintain their independence from rival monotheistic states, the Muslim caliphate and the Christian Byzantine empire. Governed by a version of rabbinical law, the Khazar Jewish kingdom flourished along the Volga basin until the beginning of the second millennium, at which point it dissolved, leaving behind a mystery: Did the Khazar converts to Judaism remain Jews, and, if so, what became of them?

Enter Shlomo Sand. In a new book, “The Invention of the Jewish People,” the Tel Aviv University professor of history argues that large numbers of Khazar Jews migrated westward into Ukraine, Poland and Lithuania, where they played a decisive role in the establishment of Eastern European Jewry. The implications are far-reaching: If the bulk of Eastern European Jews are the descendents of Khazars—not the ancient Israelites—then most Jews have no ancestral links to Palestine. Put differently: If most Jews are not Semites, then what justification is there for a Jewish state in the Middle East? By attempting to demonstrate the Khazar origins of Eastern European Jewry, Mr. Sand—a self-described post-Zionist who believes that Israel needs to shed its Jewish identity to become a democracy—aims to undermine the idea of a Jewish state.

Published in Hebrew last year, “The Invention of the Jewish People” was a best seller in IsraHell...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703746604574464023091024180.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://www.fantompowa.info/13th%20Tribe.pdf

Russia's principled policy in the Levant is based on international law, will it stand the test of Time...

Russia's policy towards Syria is one based on principles and not one which will change depending on circumstances.  Russia has clearly said that it will never allow a "Libya 2" in Syria.  That is a principled position which in itself does not secure an outcome, only excludes a specific scenario...

Several Russian (and Ukrainian) nationals have been kidnapped by the Al-CIAda insurgents which, in a typical Wahhabi-thuggish manner, are now demanding a ransom in US dollars.  This is an ominous development which the Kremlin cannot ignore.  Again, contingency plans do NOT AT ALL mean a change in policies.  To take all the necessary measures to protect its nationals is an inherent obligation of any state and not an original policy.

Fundamentally, Russia is using the power that it has (veto at the UNSC) and stays away from pretending to use the power it does not have (military intervention). This is also exactly what China is doing, all for the same reasons, yet nobody is constantly speaking about Chinese zig-zags on China.  Why?  Because China is not the ex-Soviet Union with global ambitions...

This is the key thing which so many experts simply cannot get used to: Russia is not a global power anymore.  In fact, it has absolutely no desire to become one again.  Russia is, of course, a major power which, in theory, could challenge the USA, just like China could.  However, both Russia and China could only do that at great, immense, risk for themselves.

And then there is the time factor: both Russia and China fully realize that they, even more than the other BRICS countries, have time on their side and that each passing year makes them stronger.  The USA, in contrast, is globally overextended, burdened by a debt it will never pay, profusely hated world wide, and the only thing which still keeps it going is the fact that the rest of the planet is too afraid of the US military to openly refuse to use the US dollar as a currency reserve and to pay for its energy.  The US is also socially dysfunctional, culturally sterile, militarily over-extended, economically de-industrialized, and politically "neo-feudal" (1% rule over 99% of serfs).  Sooner or later the USA will become weak enough to make it possible for any major power, including Russia or China and Brazil, to openly defy it, but while it is still powerful but weakening it is an extremely dangerous foe which should not be under-estimated.  This is why Russia, along with the other regional powers on the planet, will continue to carefully wait for the right time and avoid any sudden move which would compromise all that it has achieved in the past 12 years...

On The EU poodles....  I would argue that the current condition of the EU is even worse than the one of the Zio-USA...  Russian politicians look at the EU in total disgust. Russian experts are saying that all that the EU had to offer was a "never ending gay-pride parade combined with a massive Maghrebization and of Africanization of its society".  That is not a bad way to put it.  The EU, as a political project, is dying, and the European society arguably is even more dysfunctional than the US one.  The likes of Sarkozy, Hollande, Cameron, Fabius, Juppe and Merkel can delude themselves by playing big power politics, but the fact that French Rafales were the first to bomb Libya will change exactly nothing to prevent the French society from dying from the truly cataclysmic influx of immigrants, most of which come from the Maghreb or Africa.  From Estonia to Portugal and from Bulgaria to Iceland, Europe is nothing more than a US colony, totally ruined by a corrupt political elite, which is sinking as fast as the Titanic did, and whose orchestra (corporate media) is still playing its happy ballroom music...

But "dying" and "dead" are very different things.  The EU is still a huge market, and the EU elites have a lot of soft power to throw around, much more than Russia.  And this is why at least for the time being, Russia will try to avoid openly antagonizing the EU...

Russia's stance on the Levant is based on principles and international law...Russia has exactly *zero* need for Syria. Russia does see Syria as a friend, and many Russian politicians see Assad's MAFIA as "friends", but that does not mean that anybody in Russia "needs" him...
In this case it is a national interest of Russia to insist that the situation be handled strictly according to international law. Russia seeks a multi-polar world and that means one in which international law is fully respected. In other words, it is in Russia's pragmatic national interest to insist on principles...

Russian gas is already going through two routes (north and south) to Europe in total safety which would never be the case if the EU depended on a pipeline going through Syria... In fact, Russia does not even "need" Iran, though I would argue that Iran is far more important to Russia than Syria... Syria and Lebanon are strategically located at the crux of the Middle-East, but Russia has very little influence in the Middle-East anyway, and there is no aspect of Russian national security to which the Middle-East would be really important except one: the fact that the USA is trying to impose its will on the Middle-East in total violation of international law which does set a dangerous and highly undesirable precedent for Russia...

To the extent that genuinely autonomous nation states continue as the major military and political arbiters of the planets military and political affairs, that would be a desirable outcome...

My worry is that transnational organizations with minimal national loyalties/allegiances are coming to dominate foreign affairs and marginalizing nation states in the process. The major globalised corporations seem to be the driving force, with their bought-and-paid-for politicians, bureaucrats and intelligence establishments who effectively moderate the treaty interpretation and development process (among other critical things). Their big potential problem lies in the ultimate loyalties/allegiances of the military establishments that they rely on as enforcers of last resort. That together with the mass of the planets population that really have come to hate America and NATO with a vengeance..., courtesy of the most Infamous White House Murder INC, following the barbaric Cheney's 9/11 and the cowardly assassination of HK, January 24th 2002 in Lebanon...

The thing that nags me deeply is the possibility of Putin and/or other capable Russian and Chinese big-hitters being made offers they can't refuse. In other words, when the chips are finally down in this accelerating global game of poker, where will their loyalties really lie?

That is a big question indeed. Which would they choose - themselves and their power or the welfare of their people?

I guess that we will never know for sure until they are actually faced with this choice. Sometimes, in historical situations, not so principled folks suddenly take a principled stance, while in other circumstances previously rather idealistic people suddenly cave in and betray the values they were supposed to stand for...CIRCA January 15th 1986...etc etc.

Regardless of personalities, there is, I believe, a very large social consensus in Russia and this social consensus is what gives real power to the Kremlin's policies. Any politician wanting to go against this social consensus would place himself in a great deal of risk and would have to start ruling by force, which would be rather dangerous.

So, the current Russian policies will stand and there will be no sudden "zig-zag!" Only Time will tell...

The Obomba/Bush three options...

The Obomba/Bush three options...

 

The Obomba/Bush administration's opposition to yesterday's United Nations General Assembly vote on the Palestine Liberation Organization's (PLO) bid for non-member observer state status once again places the United States outside the consensus of the vast majority of the international community. While the merits and usefulness of such a move by the PLO can be debated, the United States has once again made it clear that it lacks any new ideas as to how to move toward a just and lasting peace in the region and suggests that the administration is likely to continue to support blindly whatever the current Israeli government wants.
However, looking forward to his second term, President Barack Obama faces three basic options for dealing with the Palestine issue. Their outlines have not really changed since the most recent Israeli attacks on Gaza. The first is the tried and true method of simply ignoring Palestine and the Palestinians, while paying lip service to the "peace process" and attempting to extract unreciprocated Palestinian concessions to Israel. This approach was practiced during most of the administration of George W. Bush, and over the last two years by that of Obama. There are many pretexts for following this course of action today. These range from the persistent political divisions in Palestinian ranks and the feebleness of the Palestinian Authority (PA) in Ramallah, to the supposedly "terrorist" nature of the Hamas leadership in Gaza. They include as well the stubborn unwillingness of the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu to engage in serious negotiations to change the intolerable status quo of never-ending settlement growth and strict Israeli control over the millions of Palestinians who have lived under Israel military occupation for over 45 years. If, as clearly seems to be the case, the Israeli government is not fully willing to allow unfettered Palestinian self-determination, terminate its occupation, and remove its settlers, what is the point of "negotiations" for the Palestinians? Another reason for doing nothing is the unbroken record of failure of every U.S. president since Jimmy Carter in trying to stop the inexorable expansion of the Israeli settlement enterprise. This vast endeavor now comprises nearly 600,000 colonists -- or about one in every 10 Israeli Jews, who live on stolen Palestinian land in a far-flung archipelago explicitly intended to make the creation of a contiguous, viable Palestinian state physically impossible, with majestic success thus far.
The second option is to make a major effort to revive a "peace process" which has been moribund for well over a decade, and was on life support long before that. There is a large body of pious conventional opinion in Washington and elsewhere that would back such an approach. Those who favor it ignore the various realities on the ground just mentioned, which make the two-state solution that is the ostensible object of this process well-nigh impossible. They ignore as well the question of why a Palestinian leader with any degree of self-respect should re-engage in a "peace process" that, far from bringing peace, has resulted in the further entrenchment of this colonial reality and of Israel's military occupation of Palestinian lands. Beyond this, the Palestinians have been imprisoned in a collection of separate, sealed Bantustans, with those in the West Bank unable to enter Jerusalem or Israel or Gaza, those in Gaza who cannot freely go anywhere at all, and those in Jerusalem who can move more freely, but are at constant risk of having their Jerusalem residency rights arbitrarily withdrawn. These are all realities that took on their full form during the 21 years of this misnamed and misbegotten "peace process," starting with the Madrid Peace Conference in 1991, and it is these realities that are the most concrete results of this process.
Moreover, from the beginning, this process has been totally dominated by the United States, which is Israel's closest ally, and a broker so prejudiced toward Israel it was once described by a senior American negotiator, Aaron David Miller, as acting as "Israel's lawyer." Many of these officials have been blatant in their sympathy for Israel and in their antipathy for the Palestinians. During a recent televised discussion I faced two of them, Elliot Abrams, a senior advisor to George W. Bush (and who served under Reagan and George H.W. Bush), and Dennis Ross, a senior advisor to both Presidents Clinton and Obama (and who served under their two Republican predecessors). I was struck by how extraordinarily alike they sounded, and by the heavy responsibility they, their colleagues, and their superiors bore for the failure of this process.
The third and last option is one never before taken by U.S. policy makers. This would involve a complete reassessment of a thoroughly bankrupt two-decade old negotiating process. This process shoe-horned the Palestinians into an "interim" self-governing authority with no sovereignty, no jurisdiction, and no real authority that has been in existence for 18 years, and deferred discussion of "final status issue" -- all the important ones like Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, water, and so forth. These core issues have never been seriously addressed in over 20 years of farcical negotiations. The Madrid-Oslo framework has produced not peace but a significant worsening of the situation of the Palestinians: it must be abandoned. Such a reassessment would require as well an acceptance that the United States, because of its profound inherent structural bias in favor of Israel, cannot monopolize peace making. This is necessary if the desired result is peace, and not yet another instance of blind American support for Israeli intransigence where the Palestine issue is concerned, which has been the outcome of every such attempt from the days of President Carter until the present.
Jimmy Carter was the first U.S. president to recognize the need for a Palestinian homeland. Ironically, it was also his administration that first accepted former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin's restrictive 1978 "autonomy plan" (an Orwellian term if ever there was one) as the absolute ceiling to which the Palestinians would be allowed to aspire. This plan was explicitly designed by Begin to prevent Palestinian self-determination and statehood, and to perpetuate and strengthen Israel's occupation and its colonial enterprise in Jerusalem and the West Bank. It has done just that, with the blessing of every U.S. administration since Carter's, under whatever rubric it was disguised since then. This path, of the 1978 Camp David agreements and the 1993 Oslo accords, which are both based directly on Begin's restrictive autonomy plan, cannot lead to peace. It can only lead where Begin, the patriarch of the Israeli right wing, meant it to go and where it has so far gone: toward the permanent subjugation of the Palestinians and the annexation of all or most of their land.
The third path, the road never before taken, would require more than just a diminution by the United States of its heretofore pervasively dominant role, and the involvement of other more neutral parties in negotiations. It would require as well that the Palestinians finally get their act together, unify their splintered ranks, end the destructive political split which has debilitated them, and come to a consensus on an imaginative new strategy for Palestinian national liberation and an end to Israeli settlement and occupation. This in turn requires abandonment of both the PA's approach of half-trying to negotiate from a position of abject weakness under the thumb of Israel and the United States under ground rules designed to favor Israel, and of Hamas's dead-end approach of reliance on violence alone under the rubric of "resistance." This will be hard for both, especially after the Netanyahu government's recent attacks on Gaza have massively enhanced the prestige and standing of Hamas among Palestinians, Arabs, and others. But it is absolutely necessary, since neither the Ramallah PA's adherence to the "peace process" as it has been structured for decades, nor Hamas rockets, have yet liberated any part of Palestine. Indeed the Palestinians are far worse off today than they were at the time of Madrid in 1991. Such a shift by the Palestinians would need to be met by greater U.S. flexibility regarding both Hamas, and the idea of the unity of all major Palestinian factions, which Washington has worked against assiduously since that group won the 2006 elections.
Given the inflexibly pro-Netanyahu political realities of Washington DC, which on this issue are unreflective of American public opinion and indeed of American Jewish opinion (after an election in which 69 percent of American Jewish voters voted for Obama in spite of Netanyahu virtually campaigning for Romney), it may be hard to see the Obama administration doing any of these things. But a new reality is emerging in the Arab world, of which we have only seen a glimmer so far. The 2012 U.S. presidential election showed that the Republican Party has come to represent the fading demographic reality of older, whiter, male southern and western America. Similarly, the Arab upheavals of the past two years have underlined the fact that the old Arab world was represented mainly by entrenched despots who would do whatever Washington wanted and who saw Iran as more of a problem for the region than Israel. This is not how most of the largely young population of the Arab world (or most of the population of Turkey) perceive their region, and in particular how they perceive the issue of Palestine. There are just beginning to arise Arab governments which in some small measure reflect both that popular will and that growing demographic reality. That development may yet be short-circuited by the efforts of forces supported by the reactionary Arab Gulf autocrats, for whom constitutional parliamentary democracies are anathema. Nevertheless, the Obama administration would be well advised to respond to these new realities in the Middle East, before the United States is once again caught behind the curve in this vital region. Instead of continuing to align itself with the old Arab order, and with the Israeli government's bullying of the Palestinians, it should help in the achievement of a just and lasting peace. This would greatly benefit not only Palestinians and Israelis, but also the standing of the United States in the Middle East and the world.

With the announcement this morning that Israel will speed up settlement building especially in E1 and the absolute silence from Zioconned Washington and Ottawa on the announcement. Don't hold your breath. Countries should start with drawing support for the sanctions against Iran if Israel does not back down on these new settlements...

 

Rashid Khalidi a friend of the Obamas..., and is Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University, a former advisor to the stupid Palestinian negotiators, who have been taken for a ride since 1964 by their atrocious PLO thugs..., and author of The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood, and the forthcoming Brokers of Deceit: How the US Undermined Peace in the Middle East. 

Kurdistan-Iraq confrontation looming, keep your eyes on Kirkuk...

Kurdistan-Iraq confrontation looming, keep your eyes on Kirkuk...

 

 

Some of my early thoughts were published in rough form earlier. My estimate of Kurdish and Iraqi Forces is that neither side is really ready for a stand-up fight. But it may happen anyway for political reasons or as deployed forces maneuver for position. If it happens, don't be surprised if it doesn't work out as planned - for either side...

Of interest, the formation of the Tigris Operational Command and the claim of forming 2 Kurdish Operational Commands in response as justification for the confrontation is pure propaganda. Establishing corps-level commands has been ongoing since the Surge and both sides require these command elements whether they are fighting each other or not. They or something like them have been projected as planned for over 5 years. For a casus belli, this is really flimsy.

In 2003, the Kurds had a dominate position but, the US did not want a divided Iraq – policy was to rebuild Iraq to remain the natural geographical roadblock for Iran. This correlation of forces has not remained static. The Iraqi Army has re-grown to 14 divisions since then while the Peshmerga was already at peak strength in 2003 and has reduced to 10-11 division-equivalents since then for budget reasons. This didn’t matter as neither could push while foreign forces prevented operations. The withdraw of US forces last year was the first opportunity for Iraq and the Kurdish Regional Government to consider the military option to settle the disputed territories.

One problem with all analysis is that both sides do not have experience in conventional war. The majority of both forces are too young to have participated in anything other than internal security. Nor have they had sufficient training in conventional war. Conventional war is not the same as COIN and neither side knows how their troops will react to high intensity conflict.

While the straight numbers of Kurdish and Iraqi forces indicate an Iraqi advantage – the basic numbers are not the whole story. While Kurdish forces can be concentrated in a confrontation with Iraq – Iraqi forces are still heavily tied down performing internal security. This is a Kurdish passing advantage as the Iraqi Federal Police is slowly taking over the lead in internal security, freeing up the Iraqi Army for other employment and training.

Iraqi Army Pros and Cons

Neither side is ready. What we are seeing from the IA is preparatory moves vice short-term conflict moves. It will be 1-2 years before the IA is ready. While neither side is currently ready, IA has more resources in the long run than KRG. The IA has effective numeric parity with the trained reorganized RGBs with its available force at this time.

That is not the full story – the IA only started training on combined arms a year ago. They are still short Artillery and will have coordination and supply issues due to lack of experience. This confrontation is not the same as counter-insurgency operations.

The IA also needs to train on new equipment. This is especially true of the 12th Division in Kirkuk – it may be politically dependable but, it is too green and only recently equipped with some armor. Only the IA 9th Armor Division is really ready for this type of fight - the rest are still shaking-down on new equipment and only started training in conventional combined arms during the last year.

While the 12th Division in Kirkuk is politically dependable - Using 12th IA Division as point is a mistake. This is the same former Strategic Infrastructure Battalions that had to be re-blued/re-greened. It is the youngest, least capable/professional div in the IA - which makes giving them armor unwise. Given the limited time, the 12th has had armor and the limited hand-me-down armor only received in the last 2 months – they are likely to be combat ineffective until they have completed a real training shakedown – probably a year.

There is a trust issue with several IA divisions in a confrontation with the KRG. Kurds serving in the IA tend to be concentrated in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Divisions – all in disputed zones. The IA needs to shift forces in the north that they cannot trust verses the KRG to southern locations, while shifting forces the GoI can trust against the KRG to replace them. That takes time.

The IA has only limited number of forces available because most of the Army is still needed for internal security - this will change with time. As the Federal Police expands and takes over internal security in various locations, the IA will have more forces freed up for training and for deployment - this is the delay. The FP is not expanding fast enough, but this will eventually allow the IA to concentrate.

The IA also need more training time on the new equipment and needs more heavy weapons. Primarily needs Artillery verses the KRG, Artillery is the biggest shortage. Most of the other systems that the IA is short of are not essential in a fight against the KRG.

Additional time to fully set up sustainment is needed for the IA. Sustainment is an issue for both forces.

While the IA/IqAF has the air power advantage – it is insufficient to be more than a localized advantage. Given more training time and additional deliveries [especially munitions] – this will change. These may be the reasons PM Maliki is talking a deal where IA and KRG forces are partnered in the disputed zones. Prime Minister Maliki is talking joint patrols in the disputed zone - Smart move. This buys time to shift and upgrade forces. Looks like a compromise but, has the effect of pinning [corseting] most of the Regional Guards Brigades to an equal force of IA. In any KRG/GoI conflict, this would reduce the KRG flexibility - thus allowing the IA to move additional forces in and defeat the KRG in detail. Also, it would draw most of the RGBs into more favorable terrain for the IA. Again, this needs time to set up.

PM Maliki appears to want to move hard but, the IA is not ready. The limited numbers of new equipment procured haven't had enough personnel training time to be effective combined arms formations. The IA is not ready yet. 1-2 years minimum to get truly functional trained, equipped, and sustainable with the new equipment.

Then there is the International fall-out. Iraq can ill afford the likely results of even a victorious war with the KRG. The reaction would probably include an international arms embargo against Iraq - Not to mention UN peacekeepers deciding the actual border. Since Iraq has no air defense and limited heavy weapons, such a result would keep Iraq weak and its government very shaky.

Kurdish Regional Guards Pros and Cons

While the KRG is still not ready, they are in better shape vis-a-vie the IA at this time than they will be in the future. Unlike the IA, almost all of the Kurdish forces are available for a conflict. 16 of a planned 20 Regional Guards Brigades have been re-organized and trained/equipped for conventional conflict. The 2 KRG mechanized Brigades and 2 SOF Brigades are already functional although the armor is obsolete. The Zerevani has reorganized into 2 divisions and received enough Carabinarie training to be effective. The I DBE Region [Division] is also Kurdish manned and significant elements of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th IA Divisions will probably join the KRG in a fight.

The RGBs are actually matching conventional training timelines with the IA - retraining/reorganizing as many RGBs as the IA in the same timeframe. 16 of 20 RGBs have been retrained and reorganized. 4 more are starting training but, this program only started a little more than a year ago. Most of the current generation of Peshmerga [like the IA] has little or no conventional combat experience. Their problem is they have a lower final end-strength and less access to heavy weapons. The IA will surpass them in 1-2 years.

The KRG has the advantage in logistics - interior shorter lines. Without more effective air strength than they have available - the IA/IqAF has no realistic way of neutralizing this KRGs advantage. But, to maintain it, the KRG needs Turkish or Iranian backing for any resupply when they run out of ammo.

Another problem is that the Kurds have not historically demonstrated an ability to fight in the plains. All the disputed areas are in the plains. They are an infantry force that has not been able to defeat Iraqi armor advantage in the past. However, the current IA does not have so much armor this time and the KRG has been reported acquiring ATGWs that might be sufficient to neutralize that advantage for now.

Conclusion

From the GoI’s position this is IA/GoI political and battlefield prep for the future – it will be 1-2 years minimum before the IA is ready for a real fight. Any fight before the IA is ready, could be very iffy for the GoI. If the fight starts this year - the KRG has a good chance of winning against the IA.

From the KRG’s standpoint, this may be the last opportunity to secure the disputed zone and try for independence. The Kurds have the current force advantage but, that will not last. The KRG's current problem is Iran and Turkey – neither wants an independent Kurdistan. Without their concurrence the KRG would be fighting a loosing battle.

Both sides are operating from a questionable military position as they cannot be sure of their forces...

Palestinian leaders seem to never miss an opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot...

 

Amongst the many calamities which have befallen the Palestinian people one of the worst ones is being systematically led by incompetent and utterly corrupt and subservient leaders with no strategic vision and a true knack for always choosing the wrong side in a conflict... From their misguided alliance with all kinds of unsavory terrorist groups in the 1970s and their atrocious behavior in Lebanon, which is still ongoing by the way..., to their support for Saddam, to their naive participation in the Oslo Accords, to today completely misguided support for the NATO-Wahhabi/Takfiri insurgents in Syria - the Palestinian leaders seem to never miss an opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot...
The fact that the Israelis have successfully split the Palestinians into three separate groups (Israeli citizens vs. West Bank residents vs. Gaza residents) is certainly the most glaring example of how easily the Palestinian elites can be manipulated. And e

ach time, there is hell to pay by the Palestinian people for such mistakes by their utterly corrupt and criminal leaders...
Look at the situation in Syria. What have the Palestinians done to themselves this time? By siding with the NATO-Wahhabi/Salafist/Takfiri, Al-CIAda insurgency, they have essentially turned against Hezbollah and Iran, their only true friends in the region. In contrast, the Israelis have carefully succeeded in completely isolating Hamas and now they can afford to safely bomb and kill as many people of the Gaza strip as they want..., while the PA and many Palestinian agents of the Zios in Gaza have become an extension of the SHINBET...
And what can Hamas do in retaliation? Fire some rather useless rockets at Israel and hype the rhetoric about "opening the Gates of Hell" for Israel which, of course, is utter nonsense. The truth is that the Israeli Iron Dome does a halfway decent job shooting down many Palestinian missiles and even when the Palestinian missiles actually succeed in killing a Israeli family (like what happened this week...), it only serves the political agenda of the Israeli government...
Palestinians are dying again as a direct consequence of the mistakes and miscalculations of the Palestinian leaders. And this really begs the following question: how many more Palestinians will have to die before the Palestinian people realize that they are led by a clique of completely incompetent leaders which do not make things better for the Palestinian people, but only worse, much worse...

 

الفتنة السنية - الشيعية.. محاذيرها ونتائجها...

.... الفتنة السنية - الشيعية.. محاذيرها ونتائجها  (ليلى نقولا الرحباني)

كان محقاً السيد حسن نصرالله في التحذير في خطابه الأخير من انجرار البعض، سواء بقصد أو بغير قصد، إلى السير في مشروع فتنة سنية - شيعية، يرمي الغرب وبعض العرب إلى إشعالها، وهي إن حصلت وتمّت كما يُخطط لها، فستؤدي إلى تدمير لبنان والمنطقة على رؤوس أبنائها جميعهم، ولن تنأى من تداعياتها دولة عربية أو مسلمة في العالم. بالفعل، أصاب السيد نصرالله في تنبيه الرأي العام الإسلامي إلى مخاطر الوقوع في فخ الفتنة تلك، فمن خلال ما نلاحظه من قراءة التقارير الغربية، ومن المؤتمرات الدولية التي نشارك بها، يمكن لنا استخلاص أهداف خطيرة جداً يرمي إليها مخططو تفجير الفتنة السنية - الشيعية، والتي يسير بها بعض المسلمين المدفوعين بدافع المذهبية البغيضة، من دون إدراك تداعياتها عليهم وعلى الأمة ككل. ولعل أبرز ما يمكن إدراجه من أهداف ذلك المخطط، يمكن اختصارها بما يلي: أولاً: إدخال المسلمين في أتون نار مذهبية دينية بين بعضهم البعض، وذلك لإلهائهم عن الأخطار الحقيقية المحدقة بهم، وأهمها الصراع العربي - "الإسرائيلي"، والمشروع الغربي الذي يرمي إلى السيطرة على المنطقة اقتصادياً وثقافياً وعسكرياً. ثانياً: تجفيف نبع الروحانية الإسلامية، وهنا يتحدث بعض الخبراء الغربيين عن ضرورة إدخال الإسلام إلى نفس "الأتون" المذهبي الديني الذي دخلت فيه أوروبا المسيحية في القرون الوسطى، والتي لم تخرج منها إلا وقد خسرت روحانيتها، وتخلى المجتمع عن تديّنه، ولفظ الكنيسة والدين، وبات من السهل اختراقها بكثير من البدع اليهودية التي دخلت إلى المسيحية وشوّهتها من الداخل، ودفعت بعض المسيحيين إلى الإيمان بالعهد القديم والأساطير التوراتية التي جاء المسيح لتصحيح النظرة إليها. وبنفس السيناريو، لا بد من اختراق الدين الإسلامي بالبدع البعيدة عن جوهر الإسلام - وهو ما نشهده اليوم من انتشار الفتاوى الغريبة والمريبة في آن - والتي تجعله بحاجة إلى ثورة إصلاحية تُخرجه من البدع تلك، والتي لن تتم إلا بإضعافه وتجويفه. ولكي يعيد التاريخ الأوروبي نفسه مع المسلمين هذه المرة، يجب أن يتمّ حكم بلاد المسلمين من قبل مؤسسات دينية متعصبة، تقوم بما قامت به الكنيسة على يد "بابوات" القرون الوسطى، فتقضي تلك الحركات الدينية المتعصبة، التي ستحكم بلاد الإسلام، على كل مظاهر الفكر والتقدم والانفتاح والتعايش، وتُغرق المسلمين بالتعصب والجهل، وتسلط عليهم فتاوى التكفير (كما تسلطت الكنيسة على الأوروبيين بتُهم الهرطقة).. والنتيجة، وكما في أوروبا، حرب دينية بين السنّة والشيعة تمتد مئة عام أو أكثر، يخرج بعدها المسلمون أضعف إيمانياً وسياسياً، وبعدها يخرجون إلى عصر الأنوار، فيسيطر الفكر المادي على الروحاني، وعندها يمكن لهم أن يخرجوا إلى العالم بفكر يدعو إلى فصل الدين على الدولة، ويدخلون في عصر نهضة حقيقية مشابهة للنهضة الأوروبية. ثالثاً: تفتيت المنطقة إلى دويلات تقسَّم على أساس عرقي أو طائفي، ما يجعل من وجود "إسرائيل" كدولة يهودية أمراً طبيعياً في محيط من الدويلات المتناحرة طائفياً، وقد تكون "إسرائيل" حينها قبلة تلك الدويلات التي يمكن لها أن تسعى للتحالف معها - باعتبارها دولة قوية عسكرياً وتكنولوجياً ومدعومة غربياً - للقضاء على أعدائها من الدويلات الأخرى. والنتيجة تكون إنهاء القضية الفلسطينية، وإسقاط حق العودة نهائياً، وتوطين الفلسطينيين اللاجئين في أماكن وجودهم في تلك الدويلات الطائفية، التي لن ترفضهم، باعتبارهم جزءاً من انتمائها المذهبي، وهم "أخوة" في الدين قد يعززون وضع الدويلة الطائفية تلك. رابعاً: القضاء على الوجود المسيحي في الشرق، ويبقى للمسيحيين وجود في بعض المناطق القليلة جداً التي تستطيع أن تقيم دويلتها القابلة للحياة، ومنها دولة الأقباط في سيناء، ودولة جنوب السودان.. أما في لبنان، فيتوهم بعض المسيحيين أنه سيكون لهم كونتونهم الخاص، يستأثرون بحكمه في ظل تحقق هذا السيناريو، ولذا يدفعون تلك الفتنة المذهبية دفعاً إلى الأمام، ويستميتون في إذكاء نارها، وهو ما لفت إليه السيد نصرالله أيضاً. لكن، ما يبدو واضحاً من خلال قراءة كل المعطيات، أن القضاء على الوجود المسيحي في لبنان يبدو ضرورة لنجاح المخطط، باعتبار أن المناطق المسيحية تشكّل عازلاً بين المناطق السنيّة والشيعية، ولا بد من إزالة الدويلة - الحاجز إما بالتهجير، أو بتدفيعهم ثمن وجودهم بين جبهتين متقاتلتين، وجعلها غير قابلة للحياة بخنقها. في المحصلة، إن المرحلة الصعبة التي نمرّ بها تحتم على السُّنة والشيعة والمسيحيين العقلاء في لبنان والعالم العربي، أن يعوا إلى أن وجودهم ومصيرهم ومستقبلهم مرهون بمدى وعيهم بما يحاك للمنطقة، وإن المصلحة الخاصة التي يحلم البعض بتحقيقها من فتنة سنية - شيعية، لن تُبقي شيئاً من الوطن كله لحكمه أو الاستئثار به

 

 

 

Coinistus Maximus Petraeus, et. all.

So it now seems that Hillary Clinton, Coinistus Maximus Petraeus, et. all. are now on a quest to find Syrians who share US values to replace the ones who shared US values before....LOL
Which suggests that the new council they are going to support (create?) will be filled with those very Al-CIAda jihadists/Takfiri/MB thugs, etc. as they are the ones on the ground fighting... Rather stunning, eh?
Smoke wafting from the shishas on the seventh floor of Foggy Bottom will have to be monitored now for indications of a successful selection of a new government in exile, well, internal exile it would seem...
Of course, Washington could find a diplomatic way out, by supporting UN peace efforts...but demonic possession by the very active ghosts of Sykes and Picot, not to mention Woody Wilson appears to rule the foreign policy elite such as it is...Demonic possession provides a more persuasive explanation than anything else that I can imagine...

Machiavelli would have avoided Syria, IMO, believing it was in pretty good hands with the ASSAD Mafia already...The "possessed" in London, Paris, and DC are inclined otherwise...
The Saudis (both official and non...) have had a long term project for Sunni triumphalism in the Levant. This is one of a number of such projects, another having been Egypt, a third being the spread of Wahhabism through endowment of mosques, etc. In the case of the Levant their technique had been the distribution of moneys to potential political allies and the use of agents of influence like Rafik Hariri for the purpose of suborning enemies and controlling "friends." Hafez Assad resisted this process and flare ups resulted in events like the Hama massacre and Hariri's first removal from office as PM of Lebanon. The Syrian rebellion provides the Saudis with their best opportunity yet for the expansion of Sunni supremacy in the Levant...LOL

Rather dull..., but they keep trying!!!

 

 

The full spectrum dominance and its madness...

The full spectrum dominance and its madness...

The mess that we find ourselves in today, is due to the miserable, evil policies of the past three American Administrations...and their despicable and cowardly assassinations, right after the Barbarism of 9/11, and the tragedy of January 24th 2002 in Hazmieh...

Humane people will not tolerate outright murder and crimes against humanity to control politics, vice, and bad habits in faraway lands...  Whenever American war tactics in the service of the odious & infamous White House Murder INC, are exposed to the international Zio-media,  the obvious criminality and immorality of the strategy being followed deliberately erase any good that might come out of the effort...in order to serve the interests of the utterly corrupt ZOG/USA.

The US military should have the planet on lockdown… yet after more than a decade of war, it has failed to eliminate a rag-tag Afghan insurgency with limited popular support...

That singular, vital to understand point is this--the American war on terror HAS NOT FAILED, it has succeeded brilliantly in its primary mission--to spread conflict over the entire planet...  The war on terror was NEVER intended to be won, it was just a means to an end, prepositioning military forces in every nation, before unleashing global nuclear war...  All of these little "piss ant" wars that the ZOG/US have been fighting, the various Partnership-for-Peace programs, Special Forces training missions, i.e. embedding the most infamous White House Murder INC, surreptitiously within local forces..., drug-interdiction and border control operations, along with the overall rubric of "fighting terrorism," have all provided the means to preposition American "Special Operators" and their weapons within other national militaries and police forces.  Their original mission has been to "win the hearts and minds" of foreign military men, before the real war begins, the war against all enemies at once...LOL  
The Pentagon would prefer to be known as a bumbling,"inept giant," rather than as the monstrous, devouring beast that it really is...and this should be known to ALL...  The Joint Chiefs have been faithfully carrying-out the desires of their corporate masters and their puppets in the Zio-White House, by spreading the Pentagon's tentacles into every corner of the planet, even to the depths of the oceans and the heights of sub-orbital space.  The Pentagon is a monster, that is set upon devouring all of the little peasant villagers who will besiege the fortified fortresses of their dark overlords.  The Pentagon is firmly committed to a policy that is best defined as "Malthusian," the calculated thinning-out of the human herd...  The Pentagon has been setting itself up as the ultimate protectors of a small group of racist elitists, who consider the rest of us as cattle, fit only to be bought and sold, improved in limited numbers through selective crossbreeding and genetic experimentation, with the remainder of the herd to be  eventually slaughtered, probably to be processed into "Solvent Green" for them...  
The day is nearly upon us when open-air thermonuclear detonations will become a regular occurrence.  The day after that day comes and goes, will be the only time when Bush's war could be judged either a resounding success, or a total failure.  Until then, only the spread of death and terminal madness will spread across the face of the Earth...

La politique de L'Ouest Zio-criminel est toujours la meme, essayer de tirer quelques avantages de ce conflit sunnites-chiites, tout en sachant que tot ou tard , il peut se retrouver agressè par le sunnite qui etait leur  » ami  intime » contre le chiite...[ Diviser pour regner depuis les 1800, rien ne change. ]...

Quel chef d’Etat occidental bien pensant ose dénoncer avec autant de force les persécutions de chrétiens et de chiites au Pakistan, Arabie Saoudite, Bahrain, etc. comme il pretendent "dénoncer" si fermement celle des sunnites Takfiri/Wahhabi et Al-CIAda en Syrie..., alors qu'ils sont leurs poulains du moment... ?

De la même manière, le massacre de dizaine de milliers de Chretiens au Liban entre 1973-1990..., et deux millions de chrétiens au Sud Soudan entre 1960 et 2007, par la dictature militaro-islamiste de Khartoum n’a jamais suscité d’intervention occidentale. Et cette élimination des chrétiens-animistes du Sud, considérés comme des esclaves par le Nord arabo-musulman, n’a jamais été reconnue comme un génocide par les Nations unies, qui ont pourtant officiellement qualifié de génocide l’assassinat de musulmans de Bosnie et du Kosovo dans les années 1990 par des nationalistes de Serbie-Yougoslavie, pays alliés des « méchants » russo-chinois (comme l’Irak de Saddam, la Libye de Kadhafi ou la Syrie d’Assad)... 

Deux poids deux mesures : les Occidentaux dénoncent les chiites de Téheran, mais pas celui encore plus totalitaire des salafistes sunnites,Takfiri/Wahhabi et Al-CIAda armés, financés et formés par l’Arabie saoudite, la Turquie, Qatar et meme Israel des fois...

La diabolisation de l’Axe syro-iranien n’a donc d’égal que la servilité de ces mêmes Zio-Occidentaux envers l’Arabie saoudite, le Koweït, pour qui l’on s’est battu, et le Qatar, nouvel ami-bienfaiteur du Hamas cree par Israel pour contrer L'OLP palestinien et des Frères musulmans. Les Etats du Golfe sont, avec Al-CIAda, le Pakistan, les vrais parrains de l’islamisme radical sunnite mondial, et leur but géopolitico-religieux est, à des degrés divers, de renverser partout en terre d’islam les derniers régimes non-soumis à la Charià, ce pour quoi ils envoient pétrodollars et prédicateurs tant en Afrique, qu’en Indonésie ou au Proche Orient afin d’étendre le règne du totalitarisme islamiste partout et ceci jusqu’aux banlieues d’Europe...

En conclusion, il est clair que le “Printemps arabe” a émerveillé les dirigeants Zio-occidentaux non pas parce qu’ils ont cru à la sincérité des appels salafistes et frères-musulmans à transformer les dictatures arabes en démocraties libérales, mais parce que ces révolutions réactionnaires ont permis à nos alliés pétro-islamistes du Golfe et à la Turquie post-kémaliste et néo-ottomane d’en finir avec les derniers régimes plus ou moins laïques nationalistes ou chiites, en général alliés de Téhéran, Pekin et de Moscou.

Grâce à Al-Jewzira (le « soft power bleu-vert ») , au Qatar, à l’Arabie saoudite, à la Turquie d’Erdogan et aux légions de salafistes et de Frères musulmans qui attendaient leur heure depuis des décennies, la Tunisie est aujourd’hui tenue d’une main de fer par les Frères musulmans du parti Enahda, et elle exporte ses Jihadistes salafistes gênants vers le Mali ou la Syrie... L’Egypte est redevenue l’épicentre du monde arabe et le siège du nouveau Califat des Frères-musulmans, tandis que le Maroc a un Premier ministre issu de leurs rangs (parti de la Justice et du Développement, du même nom que le parti islamiste anti-kémaliste au pouvoir en Turquie).

Dans la Libye terrorisée par les Salafistes d'Al-CIAda..., le nouveau Premier Ministre libyen soi-disant modéré est surtout le garant de l’application de la Charià est il est lui aussi issu des Frères musulmans. Le Yémen, quant à lui “libéré” de l’ex-Président chiite-laïc Ali Abdallah Saleh, est l’un des fiefs d’Al-CIAda et les commandos clandestins Israeliens d'origine Yemenite, avec la zone Syrie, Liban, Mali-Niger-Nigeria et la zone-Af-Pak…

Enfin, la Jordanie du Zio-roi Abdallah II risque d’exploser sous la pression des Frères musulmans, majoritaires chez les jordano-palestiniens, tandis que le Hamas terroriste cree par Israel voisin a retrouvé ses parrains naturels Zio-sunnites du Golfe, d’où l’accueil triomphal à Gaza cette semaine de l’émir du Qatar Ben Shalom Khalifa Al-Thani ....

Cela ressemble a une lutte inter-tribale mais les enjeux sont mondiaux (canal de suez –Bab al-mandeb, golfe persique-emirats petroliers- Hormouz, Chine, Hezbollah, Liban-Israel-mediterrannèe... )

Controlled chaos is fine..., 14HMars diffuse political identity resonates little with the Lebanese...March 14 licking their opportunistic lips, with utter cluelessness about the way the winds were blowing....

 

The changing face of a crumbling and utterly criminal empire is just more of the same...

The US vogue to strive for a militarily "light footprint" seems timely for a nation that's thrown untold billions of dollars in weaponry, technology and bribes at a remarkably diverse set of enemies in the past decade. But this isn't the fundamental re-evaluation of warfare and intervention that's needed in Zioconned Washington...

Sure, we "saw" the effect of war in a much more close up way than most of our fellow citizens in Lebanon, but not nearly as much as those who truly bore the brunt of battle...

We are in a whining, hand wringing mode of hysteria, concocted by the infamous White House Murder INC, & about "terrorism" promoted by the crooked media and by cowardly politicians. We need to deal with the threat, together with the valiant Resistance, in a determined manner from the shadows and silently...

 

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NJ30Ak01.html

 

 

 

Achrafiyyeh, a whiff of an entrapment , a brilliantly plotted ambush by CIA, but with a powerful blow-back...

Achrafiyyeh, a whiff of an entrapment , a brilliantly plotted ambush by CIA, but with a powerful blow-back...

 

En ce qui concerne l'attentat d'Achrafiyyeh, il était tout à fait prévisible et attendu en la personne de la cible (le général Wissam al-Hassan) qui a signé son arrêt de mort le 9 août dernier en procédant de son propre chef à l'arrestation de l'ancien ministre Michel Samaha...
Wissam Hassan se croyait protégé par les services Américains criminels et ses sponsors Zio-saoudiens et d'autres...

Il avait drôlement tort. Au delà du concert des "pleureuses", sa mort arrange tout le monde....
Il faudra bien qu'à un moment ou un autre un "lampiste" paye les pots cassés...
Je crains beaucoup que ce soit lui et l'arrivée officielle hier à Beyrouth d'une délégation du FBI pour enquêter sur l'attentat contre Wissam Hassan en dit long sur l'indépendance et la marge de manœuvre des responsables politiques libanais, stupides et inféodés aux Américains....
Ce n'est pas parce que je m'interroge sur la composition, la stratégie, les objectifs et les financements de la rébellion Syrienne a la solde de la CIA, que je suis partisan du régime en place dont j'ai au contraire dénoncé sans relâche depuis 1996 le caractère autoritaire, communautaire, brutal, assassin et fermé.
- Enfin, ce n'est pas parce que les baasistes avaient tort que les islamistes ont raison. Il est exact que je déplore la marginalisation, voire l'éradication, des idéologies laïques et pluralistes dans le monde arabe et musulman. . Ce n'est peut être pas du goût des 14HMARS mais c'est une position que je revendique fermement...

Les sociétés du Levant sont, comme vous le savez sans doute tous, des sociétés féodales où le pouvoir d'un chef se mesure à sa capacité à protéger ceux qui le servent...
Wissam Hassan, Ancien chef des gardes du corps de Rafiq Hariri, totalement dévoué aux intérêts Zio-Saoudiens avant ceux du Liban, nommé chef du service de renseignement des Forces de Sécurité Intérieures (FSI), ce Général a organisé en août dernier - à l'insu de ses chefs et des responsables politiques du pays mais en liaison étroite avec les services Américains qui lui ont fourni toute l'assistance logistique nécessaire (écoutes, surveillance aérienne, surveillance radio et vidéo, analyses de laboratoire, protection des informateurs mis sous programme de protection aux Etats Unis, etc.), l'arrestation de l'ancien ministre et député libanais Michel Samaha, devenu l'un des conseillers les plus écoutés de Bashar Assad l'assassin extraordinaire....qui jusqu'en 2003 était en étroite collaboration avec les Amerlocks de la CIA, a travers la liaison étroite de Assef SHAWKAT avec la CIA,DIA, DGSE, etc...
En procédant à l'arrestation et à l'incarcération dans des conditions inhumaines de l'ancien ministre Samaha, le Général Hassan a mis le pouvoir syrien en position très difficile. Ou bien le Président Assad ne réagissait pas et tous ses partisans au Liban (il y en a beaucoup notamment parmi les Sunnites et non-sunnites) se seraient éloignés de lui. Ou bien il intervenait officiellement et la communauté internationale l'aurait accusé "d'ingérence" inadmissible dans les affaires libanaises...

 

Dans ces conditions on pouvait s'attendre à ce que Wissam Hassan soit la cible d'un attentat "aveugle" et non revendiqué, même si tout le monde sait très bien à quoi s'en tenir...
Wissam Hassan en était parfaitement conscient puisque, quand il a été victime de l'attentat, il rentrait de Washington où il avait été solliciter avec insistance auprès du Général Petraeus actuel DCI/ de la CIA, et (le chef d'état major américain) , la protection des services criminels U.S. !
Ce que Wissam Hassan n'a pas compris c'est que, ayant bien servi les intérêts Zio-Saoudiens et américains , il devenait encombrant car susceptible d'en parler et de dire qu'il avait servi des puissances étrangères au détriment des intérêts de son propre pays...

Reprenons les faits si vous le voulez bien...
Le 9 août dernier, le Général Wissam el-Hassan procède à l'aube à l'arrestation hors de tout cadre légal de l'ancien ministre et député libanais Michel Samaha sur la base de suspicion de transport d'explosif et de préparation d'attentats au Liban.

N'étant pas sur le terrain au moment des faits, et ne disposant pas d'accès privilégié à l'information, je ne suis pas en mesure de porter de jugement définitif sur l'affaire Samaha et la matérialité des faits qui lui sont reprochés.
Cependant plusieurs choses me paraissent très troublantes :
- Pourquoi les Syriens ont-ils brusquement éprouvé le besoin de faire passer quelques dizaines de kilos d'explosif (le contenu d'un coffre d'Audi) au Liban alors qu'on trouve sans peine et en quantités quasi illimitée armes et explosifs au Liban (la preuve en a été administrée a Ashrafiyyeh....) ?
- En admettant qu'ils aient eu besoin d'engins spécifiques, pourquoi ne pas en avoir confié le transport à quelques petites mains habituelles qui l'auraient fait pour quelques dizaines de dollars sans poser de question et tant pis pour eux s'ils se font prendre ?
- Pourquoi confier ce transport à un Monsieur de 64 ans, deux fois ministre, deux fois député, parfaitement connu de tout le monde, ne pouvant passer inaperçu (il mesure 1,92 et sa figure est connue de tous au Liban) et connu dans le monde entier comme un partisan et un conseiller écouté du Président syrien ? Depuis le mois de juin, des tracts avec sa photo grand format édités par les milieux salafistes/Al-CIAda circulaient dans tout le Liban appelant à son kidnapping et à son assassinat..., comme ils l'ont déjà fait avec les criminels de la USCFL en 2000/01/02 sur le Web...contre HK Elie HOBEIKA...qui a conduit a son assassinat tragique le 24-01-2002 a 9.40 du matin a Hazmieh...
- Pourquoi, à l'occasion d'une opération aussi délicate, M. Samaha aurait-il embarqué dans sa voiture le Général Jamil Sayyed, ancien chef de la Sûreté Générale, également connu de tout le monde, mis en cause dans l'assassinat de Rafiq Hariri, qui venait de passer quatre ans en prison à Roumieh...et que la cour pénale internationale STL/TSL a dû remettre en liberté, car il est apparu au cours de l'instruction que tous les témoins à charge contre lui avaient menti, parfois grossièrement ?
- Pourquoi M. Samaha aurait-il remis dans le parking souterrain de son propre immeuble à Ashrafiyyeh (quartier chrétien de Beyrouth) les explosifs à M. Milad Kfouri dont tout le monde (même moi) savait depuis 1976 qu'il "mangeait à tous les râteliers", qu'il était un agent du deuxième bureau (service de renseignement de l'armée Libanaise) infiltré au sein des Kataëbs puis des Forces libanaises ? Ancien chef du service de sécurité des Kataëb puis conseiller Diplomatique de Bashir Gemayel, M. Samaha ne pouvait nullement ignorer ce point...
- Pourquoi Milad Kfouri, seul témoin oculaire de cette affaire, a-t-il été transporté avec sa famille, visa et carte de séjour (délivrés en urgence) par avion aux Etats Unis le jour même de l'arrestation de M. Samaha ?
- Pourquoi Milad Kfouri refuse-t-il de revenir au Liban pour témoigner comme le lui en fait avec insistance la demande, le juge d'instruction qui lui a adressé plusieurs convocations ?
- Pourquoi l'enquête et l'arrestation ont-elles été menées par le service de renseignement des FSI (dirigé par un officier proche de l'opposition et des milieux sunnites pro-saoudiens) alors que, considérant les faits et s'agissant d'une atteinte à la sûreté de l'Etat, elle était de la compétence de la Sûreté Générale ?
- Pourquoi le Président Sleïman, le premier ministre Mikati et le ministre de l'intérieur (autorité supérieure des FSI) ont-ils manifesté une intense stupéfaction devant cette arrestation dont ils n'avaient manifestement pas été informés ?
- Pourquoi les mandats d'arrêt et de perquisitions ont-ils été signés par un juge d'instruction 12heures après l'arrestation et les perquisitions ?
- Pourquoi Mr. Samaha n'a-t-il été autorisé à voir ses avocats que 5 jours après son arrestation, période pendant laquelle (constatations médicales incontestables) il a été privé de sommeil, de nourriture, des médicaments que son état de santé nécessite, soumis à un vacarme incessant de bruits très forts et de lumières très vives et avec une seule bouteille d'eau pour cinq jours ?
Etc. etc.
Au total, je n'ai évidemment aucune compétence pour juger moi-même de la matérialité des faits qui sont reprochés à Mr. Samaha, mais il faut tout de même avouer qu'il y a un peu trop de zones d'ombre et de faits inexpliqués et inexplicables dans cette affaire...
Si nous ajoutons à cela que les brigades spéciales des FSI (brigade 16 à Beyrouth, brigade 18 à Tripoli) fournissent sans même s'en cacher des armes et des explosifs aux rebelles syriens et aux partis salafistes qui les soutiennent (notamment le Hizb at-Tahrir à Tripoli et bien d'autres...), les Libanais ne peuvent s'attendre à être considérés comme "neutres" et à l'écart des soubresauts du pays voisin..., et ils le savaient pertinemment bien...
Je ne soutiens nullement que Mr. Samaha est innocent mais son cas mériterait quand même une enquête un peu plus sérieuse.
Les gouvernements français et Américains n'ont pas à s'immiscer dans les affaires intérieures libanaises, c'est évident...
Mais je reproche à la Zio-presse prétendument "d'investigation" française, Libanaise et autres de ne pas investiguer et de se contenter de la "vérité officielle" qui conforte leurs prises de position tranchées en noir et blanc...

 

For that matter, Jamil al-Sayyid, who is said to have been in the car with Michel Samaha when he conducted his bomb run, may have similarly been a perfect target for such a powerful CIA sting operation...

The whole affair had more than a whiff of entrapment about it, a brilliantly plotted ambush by CIA-MOSSAD which Samaha and his overlords unwittingly walked into... Samaha could have been duped into carrying the explosives by a high-ranking member of the Syrian intelligence community who had secretly defected to the CIA years and years ago, and was suddenly used in that sting... This person would then have tipped off the CIA about the ongoing “plot” and all its details of twists and turns, leading to an arrest that was very damaging to the Syrian regime of utter assassins for hire....

 

 

Demonization Galore by FDDC pawns and petty disposable tools...

 

 

 

Information Warfare and Demonization Galore by FDDC pawns and petty disposable tools...

 

It's not enough to complain everyday about the policy directions of the 14HMARS, you have to remind the Lebanese and the World, where the 500 Million USD of Jeffrey CIA Feltman went to in Lebanon and beyond...

Elias Michel MURR, Aljoumhouria rag newspaper, MTV's crappy TV and Gabriel MURR and his sons, Nadim KOTEISH & the idiot Wehbe Qatisha and Future TV of the Wahhabi Hariri thieves, NTV, Al-Shira3h and many others are FDDC creeps and thugs, part and parcel of the FDDC shenanigans, CIA and MOSSAD in MENA, fully financed by the Wahhabi kingdom of filth, CIA and FDDC. They invent and regurgitate so called News as they go along everyday, based on utter disinformation and direct instructions from the Pentagon's FDDC and IDF's hooligans in Washington, Riyadh and Tel Aviv...

FDDC,

Foreign Denial and Deception Committee (US CIA...)

 

 

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Foreign_Denial_and_Deception_Committee

 

 

http://ni-u.edu/schools/SSTI/DDASP__program.html

 

 

http://www.english.moqawama.org/essaydetails.php?eid=20227&cid=256

 

 

 

 

The devious Erdogan Zio-Administration has the audacity to describe Syrian self-defense against the Turkish proxy forces within Syria as "aggression...

 

“In New York, Turkey’s United Nations ambassador, Ertugrul Apakan, wrote to the presidency of the security council. ‘This is an act of aggression by Syria against Turkey...’”  LOL

[The devious Erdogan Zio-Administration has the audacity to describe Syrian self-defense against the Turkish proxy forces within Syria as "aggression."  Maybe it is time for some other megalomaniacal would be world dictator to come along and pound the shit out of all of these cocky little minion Zio-states like Zioconned USA, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, IsraHell, Libya, the 14Hmars in Lebanon and Qatar?  But that would only be supporting another illegal, immoral insurgency within those countries,  just as those countries have done to the Syrian people, penalizing the innocent along with the guilty Assad Mafia of Zio-Killers/Assassins...  There is no justification under any circumstances for what the Zio-USA have done in Syria and before that, in Lebanon/06, in Libya, and a dozen other places.  Zio-USA DID NOT answer a call to support an ongoing revolution, Zio-USA organized and started that "Syrian revolution" that has been expanded into the Syrian Civil War.  It is all based upon lies, over layers of even more Zio-USA lies.  Everything about the anti-Syrian aggression is a fabrication, just as is the entire "terror war."  Every dead American or foreign soldier, every dead civilian or "terrorist" has died for a Zio-USA lie.  Zio-USA are the aggressor in all cases, since the original big aggression in 200, the infamous inside Job of the 9/11 Barbaric attacks on US soil by the utterly criminal Zio-US Deep state....  
The human race has to find some other way to communicate with each other, other than through the usual "dialogue of weapons."   The dialogue of weapons is a type of "body language" that is measured in body counts, rather than through nuance.  Nations speak with weapons whenever words fail them, just as individuals do.  Breaking this cycle is the most important task that any human being may undertake in life.  But then, Zio-USA would still be stuck with all of those corrupted individuals in government, as in all human endeavors, who harbor aggressive intentions towards their fellow man.  World Peace would require that all such individuals be resisted with ultimate, absolute force.  The missing dialogue, to eliminate this "dialogue of weapons," begins whenever we start to defend the integrity of our language against concerted attacks upon reason itself, differentiating between legitimate "self-defense" and "aggression."  What we have today in Syria is a legitimate war of self-defense against Zio-USA foreign-sponsored aggression against the Syrian state/people...  

There seems to be only one way to prevent the utterly criminal Bushes, Obamas, the Clintons, the Erdogans, the Al-Sauds, and the Thanis, [ MBs, Salafist/Takfiris- Wahhabis ] of this world from turning the deteriorating Syrian situation into a regional or worldwide conflagration, and that is, to begin our own self-defense right here, where the psychopaths are staging their semantic attacks, blurring the definitions of key words which define their aggressions. That one concept, that of twisting definitions, is the key to all psychological warfare and the primary tactic being deployed by the Zio-USA Imperialists today.  Whenever they successfully flip certain concepts, substituting their false definitions, then they can successfully paint Lebanese or Syrian  defenders as "aggressors," whenever an errant, or purposefully misfired artillery shell lands on the territory of the real "aggressor state."  Whenever these evil deceptions truly take hold, resulting in American and Russian forces ultimately standing eyeball-to-eyeball in Syria, then there will be no limit to the number of big shells, missiles and gravity bombs that will fall on Turkish territory. Turkey will then pay a heavy price for volunteering to be a front-line state, as they try to push that border line southward, into Syrian space....and the exact same thing could happen on the front lines of South Lebanon, the Persian Gulf, or elsewhere...] 

People spin events any god damn way they think advances their interests. Always have...always will. Not on every occasion....but whatever bug you have up your butt on this...

Part of Syria's troubles are indeed to do with oil, gas and geopolitics...
1. There appear to big gas fields, and perhaps oil, in the Eastern Mediterranean, in Greek, Cypriot, Turkish, Lebanese and Israeli waters. As you would expect, this is already creating tensions between Greece and Turkey. There appears to be maneuvering going on by oil companies, including American companies, over exploration and development rights and there is a direct link between all said companies and their respective Governments.
2. There is a desire by Europe to diversify its energy supplies away from Gazprom and Russia who have Europe by the short end curlie's at present. Part of this strategy involves pipelines from Central Asian and Iranian gas fields to the Mediterranean to bypass Russia.
It is not hard to see that temptations to meddle in the region are so strong...

So, Escalation and madness... It seems that the fog of war has already settled in to some degree.  What scenarios are we looking at here? We have the Anglo-French war against Syria backed by the Zio-US ongoing. The Anglo-French and the Zio-US are allied to the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia and the Qataris who in turn are supporting the Salafist/Takfiri/MBs and Wahhabi terrorists inside Syria, Iraq and Lebanon who move in and out of Turkey for safe haven and staging.  We have Salafi brigades from Libya and Tunisia and so on in the mix in Syria, again moving in and out of Turkey as safe haven. The Turks are in a neo-Ottoman expansionist mode spurred by massive investments from the Gulfis/Wahhabis who have their own global jihad ongoing. Add in the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt and its secret and not so secret branches in other lands such as Syria. Now we have an escalation of tension between Turkey and Syria.  Turks attack Syria next?  With NATO or without NATO?  US joins in.  One would then expect a reply from Syria and its allies such as Russia, Iran, factions in Lebanon.  Thus regional war involving Iran? Presumably, Iranians are patriotic folk who will support their government whether or not they agree with it.  This seemed to be the case in the 1980s. Iranians rally to defend their country. There are a lot of them and they have some serious organizations such as the Rev Guards and also asymmetric capabilities. Iran replies by setting the Gulf states on fire so to speak.  Israel cannot defend against CBW.  So nukes not needed and Iran does not have them anyways. In the regional war, if not general war, the Israelis attempt to "transfer" all Palestinians out of Israel and the West Bank.  This engenders still more chaos.  Can Israel and the Zionist experiment survive in such circumstances? And does the Jewish Agency really care as it readjusts its strategic global Diaspora management? 

NATO: Attacking yourself, to obtain the right to defend yourself, from yourself....R2P in action...

 NATO Uses Turkey, Who Uses Free Syrian Army, To Self-Authorize NATO Attack On Syria...

[This Israeli government spokesman is appealing to the world to accept the proposition that any stray bullets or shells coming across the border from Syria are an  "attack" upon Turkey, and by extension, an attack upon NATO.  This statement is intended to back-up the recent Turkish Parliament authorization for military operations inside Syria.  So Turkey is now ready to do what Israel has been afraid to do, go to war against Syria.  It would almost seem as though Israel and Turkey had planned all of this from the beginning, were it not for that ugly little incident with the Gaza Flotilla and the IDF attack upon the MV Mavi Marmara aid ship, on May 31 2010.  Less than one year later, in March or April 2011. the civil war was beginning inside Syria.  
Is it more likely that two bitter antagonists could completely reverse their animosity in less than a year, to suddenly emerge united with one purpose, or is it more reasonable to assume that Israel and Turkey were secretly working hand-in-glove all along?
The anti-Syria project is part of the Greater Middle East strategy of the United States.  Therefore, we are at this critical juncture in the anti-Syrian project (Israel supporting Turkey's call for NATO intervention, while Obama appears to be cautioning against it) because that has been the plan all along, to give the President the appearance of having "clean hands."  Either that, or this has been an Israeli operation from the beginning, to force Turkey and the US/NATO into eliminating Syria for Israel.  For that matter, you would then have to credit the Israelis for the entire Greater Middle East project, even though the whole thing fell apart when US/NATO forces failed to pile-on on the side of Israel against Hezbollah in 2006.  If Israelis had been in charge of the terror war at that time, Syria would have been bombed back to the Stone Age long ago.  Therefore, the only reasonable assumption to make is that Israel has been handling the CIA's dirty work in laying the groundwork for this latest anti-Syrian operation, in order to maintain plausible deniability for Washington.  
Turkey and Israel appeared to be set at odds, in order to elevate Turkey's image in the Muslim world.  Saudi Arabia and Qatar were allowed to conduct their own foreign policies (which appeared to be going against the desires of Obama) for the same reason, to elevate their status on the Muslim street.   Together, the three "maverick" Arab governments have appeared to take the lead in the American/NATO/Arab alliance, creating a so-called "Islamic NATO," which was used to overthrow the Libyan government and to murder Muammar Qaddafi.  This Islamist NATO has led the preliminary battles which have been scheduled as the opening rounds of the bigger war to come, as justification at the United Nations Security Council to empower the real NATO forces inside Syria, so they can do the same to the assassin Bashar Assad... who until few years back in 2001/2002 was part and parcel of the Infamous White House Murder INC, in the Levant and the CIA's rendition and torture program headed by the monster Assef SHAWKAT...
Turkey has been America's primary puppet in this grand deception all along, meaning that the Turkish government has sanctioned the attack which killed eight Turkish citizens on the MV Mavi Marmara in the Gaza Flotilla and probably the PKK attack upon the  Turkish Navy Barracks at Iskenderun earlier that same morning, as well.  In that rocket attack, seven Turks were killed.  State acquiescence to false flag attacks upon their own citizens seems to be a requirement of all participants in America's terror war, a pattern set by the example of the US Govt. itself on 9-11-2001 (SEE:  US/NATO Seeking Escape Mechanism for New Formula for Imperial Aggression).  The "war on terror," a.k.a., "plan for Greater Middle East," is a Pentagon operation, from the beginning, intended to unleash the power of NATO through a series of wars of aggression, without upsetting the American image in the world.  In this way, the US military can utilize its power to the fullest, even violating the nuclear threshold, without turning the world against us.  Now, all that is left is for NATO forces to be successfully brought to bear in Syria, squaring the circle, without making us the "bad guys" against a global "Arab Spring."  NATO is still perfecting the mechanism which will enable them to reliably use "false-flag operations" to create "fault-free" wars of aggression, attacking yourself, to obtain the right to defend yourself, from yourself.]