The devious Erdogan Zio-Administration has the audacity to describe Syrian self-defense against the Turkish proxy forces within Syria as "aggression...

 

“In New York, Turkey’s United Nations ambassador, Ertugrul Apakan, wrote to the presidency of the security council. ‘This is an act of aggression by Syria against Turkey...’”  LOL

[The devious Erdogan Zio-Administration has the audacity to describe Syrian self-defense against the Turkish proxy forces within Syria as "aggression."  Maybe it is time for some other megalomaniacal would be world dictator to come along and pound the shit out of all of these cocky little minion Zio-states like Zioconned USA, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, IsraHell, Libya, the 14Hmars in Lebanon and Qatar?  But that would only be supporting another illegal, immoral insurgency within those countries,  just as those countries have done to the Syrian people, penalizing the innocent along with the guilty Assad Mafia of Zio-Killers/Assassins...  There is no justification under any circumstances for what the Zio-USA have done in Syria and before that, in Lebanon/06, in Libya, and a dozen other places.  Zio-USA DID NOT answer a call to support an ongoing revolution, Zio-USA organized and started that "Syrian revolution" that has been expanded into the Syrian Civil War.  It is all based upon lies, over layers of even more Zio-USA lies.  Everything about the anti-Syrian aggression is a fabrication, just as is the entire "terror war."  Every dead American or foreign soldier, every dead civilian or "terrorist" has died for a Zio-USA lie.  Zio-USA are the aggressor in all cases, since the original big aggression in 200, the infamous inside Job of the 9/11 Barbaric attacks on US soil by the utterly criminal Zio-US Deep state....  
The human race has to find some other way to communicate with each other, other than through the usual "dialogue of weapons."   The dialogue of weapons is a type of "body language" that is measured in body counts, rather than through nuance.  Nations speak with weapons whenever words fail them, just as individuals do.  Breaking this cycle is the most important task that any human being may undertake in life.  But then, Zio-USA would still be stuck with all of those corrupted individuals in government, as in all human endeavors, who harbor aggressive intentions towards their fellow man.  World Peace would require that all such individuals be resisted with ultimate, absolute force.  The missing dialogue, to eliminate this "dialogue of weapons," begins whenever we start to defend the integrity of our language against concerted attacks upon reason itself, differentiating between legitimate "self-defense" and "aggression."  What we have today in Syria is a legitimate war of self-defense against Zio-USA foreign-sponsored aggression against the Syrian state/people...  

There seems to be only one way to prevent the utterly criminal Bushes, Obamas, the Clintons, the Erdogans, the Al-Sauds, and the Thanis, [ MBs, Salafist/Takfiris- Wahhabis ] of this world from turning the deteriorating Syrian situation into a regional or worldwide conflagration, and that is, to begin our own self-defense right here, where the psychopaths are staging their semantic attacks, blurring the definitions of key words which define their aggressions. That one concept, that of twisting definitions, is the key to all psychological warfare and the primary tactic being deployed by the Zio-USA Imperialists today.  Whenever they successfully flip certain concepts, substituting their false definitions, then they can successfully paint Lebanese or Syrian  defenders as "aggressors," whenever an errant, or purposefully misfired artillery shell lands on the territory of the real "aggressor state."  Whenever these evil deceptions truly take hold, resulting in American and Russian forces ultimately standing eyeball-to-eyeball in Syria, then there will be no limit to the number of big shells, missiles and gravity bombs that will fall on Turkish territory. Turkey will then pay a heavy price for volunteering to be a front-line state, as they try to push that border line southward, into Syrian space....and the exact same thing could happen on the front lines of South Lebanon, the Persian Gulf, or elsewhere...] 

People spin events any god damn way they think advances their interests. Always have...always will. Not on every occasion....but whatever bug you have up your butt on this...

Part of Syria's troubles are indeed to do with oil, gas and geopolitics...
1. There appear to big gas fields, and perhaps oil, in the Eastern Mediterranean, in Greek, Cypriot, Turkish, Lebanese and Israeli waters. As you would expect, this is already creating tensions between Greece and Turkey. There appears to be maneuvering going on by oil companies, including American companies, over exploration and development rights and there is a direct link between all said companies and their respective Governments.
2. There is a desire by Europe to diversify its energy supplies away from Gazprom and Russia who have Europe by the short end curlie's at present. Part of this strategy involves pipelines from Central Asian and Iranian gas fields to the Mediterranean to bypass Russia.
It is not hard to see that temptations to meddle in the region are so strong...

So, Escalation and madness... It seems that the fog of war has already settled in to some degree.  What scenarios are we looking at here? We have the Anglo-French war against Syria backed by the Zio-US ongoing. The Anglo-French and the Zio-US are allied to the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia and the Qataris who in turn are supporting the Salafist/Takfiri/MBs and Wahhabi terrorists inside Syria, Iraq and Lebanon who move in and out of Turkey for safe haven and staging.  We have Salafi brigades from Libya and Tunisia and so on in the mix in Syria, again moving in and out of Turkey as safe haven. The Turks are in a neo-Ottoman expansionist mode spurred by massive investments from the Gulfis/Wahhabis who have their own global jihad ongoing. Add in the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt and its secret and not so secret branches in other lands such as Syria. Now we have an escalation of tension between Turkey and Syria.  Turks attack Syria next?  With NATO or without NATO?  US joins in.  One would then expect a reply from Syria and its allies such as Russia, Iran, factions in Lebanon.  Thus regional war involving Iran? Presumably, Iranians are patriotic folk who will support their government whether or not they agree with it.  This seemed to be the case in the 1980s. Iranians rally to defend their country. There are a lot of them and they have some serious organizations such as the Rev Guards and also asymmetric capabilities. Iran replies by setting the Gulf states on fire so to speak.  Israel cannot defend against CBW.  So nukes not needed and Iran does not have them anyways. In the regional war, if not general war, the Israelis attempt to "transfer" all Palestinians out of Israel and the West Bank.  This engenders still more chaos.  Can Israel and the Zionist experiment survive in such circumstances? And does the Jewish Agency really care as it readjusts its strategic global Diaspora management? 

NATO: Attacking yourself, to obtain the right to defend yourself, from yourself....R2P in action...

 NATO Uses Turkey, Who Uses Free Syrian Army, To Self-Authorize NATO Attack On Syria...

[This Israeli government spokesman is appealing to the world to accept the proposition that any stray bullets or shells coming across the border from Syria are an  "attack" upon Turkey, and by extension, an attack upon NATO.  This statement is intended to back-up the recent Turkish Parliament authorization for military operations inside Syria.  So Turkey is now ready to do what Israel has been afraid to do, go to war against Syria.  It would almost seem as though Israel and Turkey had planned all of this from the beginning, were it not for that ugly little incident with the Gaza Flotilla and the IDF attack upon the MV Mavi Marmara aid ship, on May 31 2010.  Less than one year later, in March or April 2011. the civil war was beginning inside Syria.  
Is it more likely that two bitter antagonists could completely reverse their animosity in less than a year, to suddenly emerge united with one purpose, or is it more reasonable to assume that Israel and Turkey were secretly working hand-in-glove all along?
The anti-Syria project is part of the Greater Middle East strategy of the United States.  Therefore, we are at this critical juncture in the anti-Syrian project (Israel supporting Turkey's call for NATO intervention, while Obama appears to be cautioning against it) because that has been the plan all along, to give the President the appearance of having "clean hands."  Either that, or this has been an Israeli operation from the beginning, to force Turkey and the US/NATO into eliminating Syria for Israel.  For that matter, you would then have to credit the Israelis for the entire Greater Middle East project, even though the whole thing fell apart when US/NATO forces failed to pile-on on the side of Israel against Hezbollah in 2006.  If Israelis had been in charge of the terror war at that time, Syria would have been bombed back to the Stone Age long ago.  Therefore, the only reasonable assumption to make is that Israel has been handling the CIA's dirty work in laying the groundwork for this latest anti-Syrian operation, in order to maintain plausible deniability for Washington.  
Turkey and Israel appeared to be set at odds, in order to elevate Turkey's image in the Muslim world.  Saudi Arabia and Qatar were allowed to conduct their own foreign policies (which appeared to be going against the desires of Obama) for the same reason, to elevate their status on the Muslim street.   Together, the three "maverick" Arab governments have appeared to take the lead in the American/NATO/Arab alliance, creating a so-called "Islamic NATO," which was used to overthrow the Libyan government and to murder Muammar Qaddafi.  This Islamist NATO has led the preliminary battles which have been scheduled as the opening rounds of the bigger war to come, as justification at the United Nations Security Council to empower the real NATO forces inside Syria, so they can do the same to the assassin Bashar Assad... who until few years back in 2001/2002 was part and parcel of the Infamous White House Murder INC, in the Levant and the CIA's rendition and torture program headed by the monster Assef SHAWKAT...
Turkey has been America's primary puppet in this grand deception all along, meaning that the Turkish government has sanctioned the attack which killed eight Turkish citizens on the MV Mavi Marmara in the Gaza Flotilla and probably the PKK attack upon the  Turkish Navy Barracks at Iskenderun earlier that same morning, as well.  In that rocket attack, seven Turks were killed.  State acquiescence to false flag attacks upon their own citizens seems to be a requirement of all participants in America's terror war, a pattern set by the example of the US Govt. itself on 9-11-2001 (SEE:  US/NATO Seeking Escape Mechanism for New Formula for Imperial Aggression).  The "war on terror," a.k.a., "plan for Greater Middle East," is a Pentagon operation, from the beginning, intended to unleash the power of NATO through a series of wars of aggression, without upsetting the American image in the world.  In this way, the US military can utilize its power to the fullest, even violating the nuclear threshold, without turning the world against us.  Now, all that is left is for NATO forces to be successfully brought to bear in Syria, squaring the circle, without making us the "bad guys" against a global "Arab Spring."  NATO is still perfecting the mechanism which will enable them to reliably use "false-flag operations" to create "fault-free" wars of aggression, attacking yourself, to obtain the right to defend yourself, from yourself.]